2001
DOI: 10.1016/s0169-2046(01)00159-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A framework for comparative landscape analysis and evaluation based on land cover data, with an application in the Madrid region (Spain)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
56
0
5

Year Published

2003
2003
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 86 publications
(71 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
56
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…Another type of integrity, ecosystem integrity, is related to the concept of resilience and is defined as the essential self-organizing capacity within ecosystems to create structures and gradients during their natural development [36]. However, most studies of landscape values generally refer to an integrity criterion that encompasses coherence, harmony, visual balance, undisturbed functional entities, continuity over time, and the fit of land use to natural characteristics [37]. Within these varied contexts, we have sought to understand how UNESCO has interpreted integrity by conducting a comparative study of rural landscape site properties.…”
Section: Gullino Et Al Marigani Et Al and Käyhkö Et Al Has Each mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another type of integrity, ecosystem integrity, is related to the concept of resilience and is defined as the essential self-organizing capacity within ecosystems to create structures and gradients during their natural development [36]. However, most studies of landscape values generally refer to an integrity criterion that encompasses coherence, harmony, visual balance, undisturbed functional entities, continuity over time, and the fit of land use to natural characteristics [37]. Within these varied contexts, we have sought to understand how UNESCO has interpreted integrity by conducting a comparative study of rural landscape site properties.…”
Section: Gullino Et Al Marigani Et Al and Käyhkö Et Al Has Each mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In many ways, there is a good agreement between the Ecologist View of nature and some general discussions of criteria for habitat and landscape management (see, e.g., OECD, 2001;Gulinck et al, 2001;Antrop, 2000). Most landscape values refer to a general criterion of integrity -meaning coherence, harmony, visual balance, undisturbed functional entities, continuity over time, and land use fitness to the natural characteristics (Gulinck et al, 2001).…”
Section: Aesthetic and Recreational Interests In The Farmed Landscapementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Stoorvogel and Antle (2001) call for the development of more generic methodologies for regional land use analysis rather then engaging in ad hoc analyses. An example of the type of tool they would like to see developed can be found in the generalized framework for evaluating landscapes in Spain using GIS that has been developed by Gulinck et al (2001). Although generalized methodologies hold significant promise for developing transferable tools, the need for scale, location and policy-specific information and methods must be considered when the time comes to apply them in specific analyses.…”
Section: Existing Farmland Preservation Gis Applicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%