2015
DOI: 10.4230/lipics.concur.2015.58
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Framework for Transactional Consistency Models with Atomic Visibility

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
20
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, early works by Fekete et al [2005] and Jorwekar et al [2007] proposed lightweight syntactic analyses to check for serializability anomalies in centralized databases, by looking for dangerous structures in the over-approximated static graph of all possible dynamic dependency conflicts. Several recent works [Bernardi and Gotsman 2016;Cerone et al 2015;Cerone and Gotsman 2016;Cerone et al 2017;Warszawski and Bailis 2017; have continued along this line, by deriving different types of problematic structures in dependency graphs that are possible under different weak consistency mechanisms, and then checking for these structures on static dependency graphs.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, early works by Fekete et al [2005] and Jorwekar et al [2007] proposed lightweight syntactic analyses to check for serializability anomalies in centralized databases, by looking for dangerous structures in the over-approximated static graph of all possible dynamic dependency conflicts. Several recent works [Bernardi and Gotsman 2016;Cerone et al 2015;Cerone and Gotsman 2016;Cerone et al 2017;Warszawski and Bailis 2017; have continued along this line, by deriving different types of problematic structures in dependency graphs that are possible under different weak consistency mechanisms, and then checking for these structures on static dependency graphs.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A function op : Event → Op determines the operation a given event denotes. We follow the specification framework in [7,8].…”
Section: Snapshot Isolationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A consistency model specification is a set of consistency axioms Φ constraining abstract executions. The model allows those histories for which there exists an abstract execution that satisfies the axioms: We first briefly explain the consistency axioms that are necessary for defining (Adya) snapshot isolation, namely Int, Ext, Prefix, and NoConflict [7,8]. In Section 2.3, we will introduce a few new consistency axioms and formally define several variants of snapshot isolation using them.…”
Section: Consistency Axiomsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…There have been several directions of work addressing the correctness of database-backed applications. We directly build upon one line of work concerned with the logical formalization of isolation levels [Adya et al 2000;Berenson et al 1995;Biswas and Enea 2019;Cerone et al 2015;X3 1992]. Our work relies on the axiomatic definitions of isolation levels, as given in [Biswas and Enea 2019], which also investigated the problem of checking whether a given history satisfies a certain isolation level.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%