2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.cie.2018.12.022
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A fuzzy decision tool to evaluate the sustainable performance of suppliers in an agrifood value chain

Abstract: Gaëlle (2019). A fuzzy decision tool to evaluate the sustainable performance of suppliers in an agrifood value chain. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 127 pp. 196-212. For guidance on citations see FAQs.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
50
0
4

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 108 publications
(62 citation statements)
references
References 98 publications
1
50
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…The Boender and FICSM model performed significantly better than other models over various experimental conditions. Liu et al [28] proposed an evaluation model that integrates triangular fuzzy numbers (TFNs), AHP, and TOPSSI in a novel way to consider quantitative and qualitative criteria as well as objective and subjective data. They implemented a case of sustainable agrifood into the proposed model.…”
Section: Fuzzy Ahp Methodologymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The Boender and FICSM model performed significantly better than other models over various experimental conditions. Liu et al [28] proposed an evaluation model that integrates triangular fuzzy numbers (TFNs), AHP, and TOPSSI in a novel way to consider quantitative and qualitative criteria as well as objective and subjective data. They implemented a case of sustainable agrifood into the proposed model.…”
Section: Fuzzy Ahp Methodologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Even though AHP is commonly used, this algorithm cannot adequately resolve the inherent uncertainties and imprecisions associated with mapping decision maker's perceptions into exact numbers [16]. Hence, numerous previous studies have combined the fuzzy set theory with AHP to solve uncertain issues [26][27][28][29][30][31]. Zhü [32] proposed that fuzzy AHP (FAHP) cannot resolve uncertain questions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Quantitative criteria are those measured by numerical values which tend to be objective data and based on facts, while qualitative criteria are those measured by linguistic expressions. Motivated by the advantage of the heterogeneous information, it has been effectively used to address various types of decision-making problems, such as product ranking [16], cloud computing service evaluation [17], and supplier evaluation [18].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If the assessment value is given as the crisp number, then Step 2 By using Equations (18) to (20), the Qsd, Qdd, and Qud of each assessment value is derived and shown in Table 3. Table 3.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Liu et al [40] used the BWM and alternative queuing method (AQM) to evaluate and select sustainable suppliers under the interval-valued intuitionistic uncertain linguistic environment. Liu et al [41] combined triangular fuzzy numbers, AHP, and TOPSIS to improve the sustainable performance of an agri-food value chain. Liu et al [11] developed an ordered weighted hesitant fuzzy group decision-making model for green supplier selection, and Wang et al [14] proposed a MCDM method with q-rung interval-valued orthopair fuzzy information to solve the green supplier selection problem.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%