2018
DOI: 10.18280/mmc_d.390106
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A fuzzy inventory model with imperfect items and backorder with allowable proportionate discount

Abstract: This paper presents both crisp and fuzzy EOQ models for defective items present in each lot when shortages are allowed and backorder takes place. The aim of the work is to first construct an optimal order quantity for the crisp case and then to develop the corresponding fuzzy model. In contrast to the previous inventory models, an allowable proportionate discount is incorporated for the defective items present in each lot to provide a general framework to the model. The aim of the present paper is to find the … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 21 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Additionally, a survey conducted by Andriolo et al (2014), which examined other deterministic and stochastic EOQ models, reviewed 17 papers containing fuzzy lot-size models. Additional studies (Bakker et al, 2012;Patro et al, 2018;Patro et al, 2019;Poswal et al, 2022; are included in the papers mentioned. They checked some fuzzy inventory models considering output and degradation, separating types of inventory models, respectively, into some classifications.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, a survey conducted by Andriolo et al (2014), which examined other deterministic and stochastic EOQ models, reviewed 17 papers containing fuzzy lot-size models. Additional studies (Bakker et al, 2012;Patro et al, 2018;Patro et al, 2019;Poswal et al, 2022; are included in the papers mentioned. They checked some fuzzy inventory models considering output and degradation, separating types of inventory models, respectively, into some classifications.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%