1986
DOI: 10.1016/0377-2217(86)90090-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A fuzzy outranking relation in multicriteria decision making

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

1993
1993
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Many other hypotheses and means of defining the conditions for an outranking test could be imagined within the framework of OA2 (see, especiaIly, Paelinck, 1978;Roubens, 1982;Hinloopen et al, 1983;Brans et al, 1984;Martel et al , 1986;Matarazzo, 1986Matarazzo, , 1988Brans and Mareschal, 1990).…”
Section: Typical Outranking Testsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many other hypotheses and means of defining the conditions for an outranking test could be imagined within the framework of OA2 (see, especiaIly, Paelinck, 1978;Roubens, 1982;Hinloopen et al, 1983;Brans et al, 1984;Martel et al , 1986;Matarazzo, 1986Matarazzo, , 1988Brans and Mareschal, 1990).…”
Section: Typical Outranking Testsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…45 From the point of view of simplicity and originality, we will prefer Roy's, Brans et al's, and Siskos et al's approaches and will compare the results for the problem of prioritizing DRs. The form used for data input in FOuR is given in Figure 2.…”
Section: A Comparative Framework Based On Fuzzy Outranking Methods Inmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Martel and DÕAvignon (1982), Martel et al (1986), DÕAvignon and Vincke (1988) already employed this approach in stochastic models. We combine this concept with the approach based on stochastic dominance.…”
Section: Formulation Of the Problemmentioning
confidence: 97%