2017
DOI: 10.1007/s11269-017-1636-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Fuzzy TOPSIS model Framework for Ranking Sustainable Water Supply Alternatives

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Chauan et al [32] combined entropy and TOPSIS for energy performance evaluation. Onu et al [33] employed fuzzy TOPSIS for ranking sustainable water supply alternatives. Pamucar et al [34] introduced hybrid DEMATEL-ANP-MAIRCA model for decision making.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Chauan et al [32] combined entropy and TOPSIS for energy performance evaluation. Onu et al [33] employed fuzzy TOPSIS for ranking sustainable water supply alternatives. Pamucar et al [34] introduced hybrid DEMATEL-ANP-MAIRCA model for decision making.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Noori et al [15] investigated the optimal dam sites in Kermanshah Province, Iran, with the Fuzzy TOPSIS method. In addition, Fuzzy TOPSIS has been applied to many other water resources issues such as water supply [16], irrigation water allocation [17], water quality failure evaluations [18,19], and water loss management [20]. Particularly, in South Korea, the Fuzzy TOPSIS method has been used to resolve various water resource problems.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…What is more, many of mankind’s choices and judgments are not in themselves perfectly rational, and human judgments including preferences are often vague. It is more appropriate to use fuzzy linguistic sets to reflect the preferences of experts in the evaluation process [ 31 , 32 , 33 , 34 ]. Therefore, triangular fuzzy linguistic sets are introduced in BWM here to more accurately describe the DMs’ qualitative judgments in reality.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%