“…Till date, many TMPs with various compositions and morphologies are reported with excellent OER activities as seen in the vast literature. However, in any case, η 100 = 260 mV of the present sample is stupendous as compared to recently reported TMP catalysts, such as Ni 2 P@NSG (η 10 = 240 mV), Co-Fe 2 P (η 50 = 251 mV), Ni/NiCoP (η 20 = 260 mV), FeNiP@N-CFs (η 10 = 300 mV), Co 2 P/NPG-900 (η 10 = 320 mV), Ni 1 Mo 1 P-NSs/MCNTs (η 50 = 327 mV), and (Ni 0.87 Fe 0.13 ) 2 P–Ni (η 10 = 257 mV), and other catalysts reported in extensive review articles, such as TM-oxides and thiospinels, − TM-chalcogenides, ,,, TM-hydroxides, ,− and TM-MXenes. ,, More comparisons are presented in Table S2 (a substrate and material-based comparison), which reveals the state-of-the-art improvement of OER activity of the present study. FCP350/NF can sustain unattenuated performance under challenging industrial conditions, i.e., entailing high corrosivity of the electrolyte (e.g., 30 wt % KOH).…”