2017
DOI: 10.1117/12.2269373
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A generic point error model for TLS derived point clouds

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
18
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
18
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…It was shown that the impact of interest increases for rising incidence angles. Interestingly, a stringent explanatory pattern can still be found in current research, see, e.g., Ozendi et al (2017) and Bolkas & Martinez (2018), that assign various influences into certain categories. In summary, the most relevant influences can be tributed to the survey configuration as well as the local radiometric characteristics of the object.…”
Section: Lidar Intensity As a Quality Measurementioning
confidence: 90%
“…It was shown that the impact of interest increases for rising incidence angles. Interestingly, a stringent explanatory pattern can still be found in current research, see, e.g., Ozendi et al (2017) and Bolkas & Martinez (2018), that assign various influences into certain categories. In summary, the most relevant influences can be tributed to the survey configuration as well as the local radiometric characteristics of the object.…”
Section: Lidar Intensity As a Quality Measurementioning
confidence: 90%
“…This is the case for some large manufacturers (Z + F, Leica, Wetzlar, Germany). For laser scanners from brands that do not offer these possibilities, other approaches [20,21] can be chosen. The precision determined with this approach includes the influences of the distance measurement, the angle of incidence and the object properties.…”
Section: Forward Modeling-quality Analysis Of 3d Point Clouds Derivedmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Backward modeling approaches are mainly 3D point clouds to point cloud comparisons (Cloud2Cloud) [19]. Surface based approaches are shown in [20,21]. The comparison of captured 3D point clouds to highly accurate 3D reference point clouds [22] is suitable here to investigate the accuracy.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We have developed an empirical formula for the range precision ( ) computation based on fieldwork and validation studies given in our previous work (Ozendi et al, 2017). It takes into account the distance between the TLS and the point, incidence angle of the incoming laser beam, and reflectivity of the object surface.…”
Section: Computation Of the Range Precision Value /mentioning
confidence: 99%