2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.fsigen.2017.04.011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A genomic audit of newly-adopted autosomal STRs for forensic identification

C. Phillips

Abstract: In preparation for the growing use of massively parallel sequencing (MPS) technology to genotype forensic STRs, a comprehensive genomic audit of 73 STRs was made in 2016 [Parson et al., Forensic Sci. Int. Genet. 22, 54-63]. The loci examined included miniSTRs that were not in widespread use, but had been incorporated into MPS kits or were under consideration for this purpose. The current study expands the genomic analysis of autosomal STRs that are not commonly used, to include the full set of developed miniST… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
22
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is likely that dragging errors in table preparation contributed to the latter. Even minimal nomenclature errors might lead to confusion with (upcoming) other STR loci, such as D2S4 4 1 vs. D2S4 1 1 [ 34 , 35 ]. In one submission, locus D5S2500 was incorrectly assigned by the typing kit manufacturer instead of D5S2800 [ 36 ].…”
Section: Results Of Strider Quality Controlmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It is likely that dragging errors in table preparation contributed to the latter. Even minimal nomenclature errors might lead to confusion with (upcoming) other STR loci, such as D2S4 4 1 vs. D2S4 1 1 [ 34 , 35 ]. In one submission, locus D5S2500 was incorrectly assigned by the typing kit manufacturer instead of D5S2800 [ 36 ].…”
Section: Results Of Strider Quality Controlmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is supported by more detailed proficiency test reports that specified manual allele calling errors, lacking separators between the two alleles at one locus, exchange of alleles between loci [ 75 ] and the tendency toward the concentration of errors in some “not so good” submissions [ 22 , 33 , 61 , 64 , 65 , 75 ]. Further analyses on (published) datasets confirmed the role of transcriptional errors [ 22 ] and found duplicate genotypes across database subsets [ 21 , 22 , 78 ], locus name misspelling [ 34 ], as well as allele swapping [ 26 ]. Information on errors and error rates in MPS STR typing is expected from ongoing collaborative exercises (P.A.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Precision ID GlobalFiler NGS STR Panel (Thermo Fisher Scientific). If new STR loci (see [16]) are targeted in commercially available assays launched in the future, additional records will be created.…”
Section: Samples and Submission Strategymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2. Approximate position in the chromosome in mega bases from Phillips 201735 3. Calculated per diploid genome, in bit, details in the supporting information.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%