A Giant Ossified Chronic Subdural Hematoma

Tian, Wei; Meng, Xin; Zou, Jidian

doi:10.29271/jcpsp.2019.09.905

Cited by 1 publication

(3 citation statements)

References 4 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…After further review, an additional three articles were excluded due to insufficient data. Thus, 15 studies [9,10,14,15,[19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29]…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Across the 15 included studies [9,10,14,15,[19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29], recurrence was reported in 512 patients at the end of follow-up. The analysis revealed no significant difference in the recurrence rate between the SDD and SPGD groups (odds ratio [OR]: 1.08 [95% confidence interval: 0.83, 1.42], I 2 = 30%, P = 0.56) (Fig 3A).…”

Section: Recurrencementioning

confidence: 99%

“…The outcome of postoperative intracerebral hematoma was utilized to assess the resultant injury to brain parenchyma caused by the maneuvering of the drainage tube. Across six studies providing relevant data, intracerebral hematoma was reported in 24 patients [9,15,19,21,26,29], and there was no significant difference between the SDD and SPGD groups (OR:…”

Section: Intracerebral Hematomamentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

Subperiosteal/subgaleal drainage vs. subdural drainage for chronic subdural hematoma: A meta-analysis of postoperative outcomes

Chen,

Xiong,

Huang

et al. 2023

PLoS ONE

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background Chronic subdural hematoma (CSDH) is commonly treated via surgical removal of the hematoma, placement of a routine indwelling drainage tube, and continuous drainage to ensure that the blood does not re-aggregate following removal. However, the optimal location for placement of the drainage tube remains to be determined. Objectives To aid in establishing a reference for selecting the optimal method, we compared the effects of different drainage tube placements on CSDH prognosis via a systematic review and meta-analysis of previous clinical studies. Data sources PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane databases. Study eligibility criteria We searched for clinical studies comparing the outcomes of subperiosteal/subgaleal drainage (SPGD) and subdural drainage (SDD) for CSDH published in English prior to April 1, 2022. Participants The final analysis included 15 studies involving 4,318 patients. Results Our analysis of the pooled results revealed no significant differences in recurrence rate between the SDD and SPGD groups. We also observed no significant differences in mortality or rates of postoperative complications (infection, pneumocephalus, or epilepsy) between the SDD and SPGD groups. Conclusions These results suggest that the choice of SDD vs. SPGD has no significant effect on CSDH prognosis, highlighting SPGD as an alternative treatment option for CSDH.

show abstract

“…After further review, an additional three articles were excluded due to insufficient data. Thus, 15 studies [9,10,14,15,[19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29]…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%