2019
DOI: 10.1007/s11160-019-09562-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A global review and meta-analysis of applications of the freshwater Fish Invasiveness Screening Kit

Abstract: The freshwater Fish Invasiveness Screening Kit (FISK) has been applied in 35 risk assessment areas in 45 countries across the six inhabited continents (11 applications using FISK v1; 25 using FISK v2). The present study aimed: to assess the breadth of FISK applications and the confidence (certainty) levels associated with the decision-support tool's 49 questions and its ability to distinguish between taxa of low-to-medium and high risk of becoming invasive, and thus provide climate-specific, generalised, calib… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
55
0
4

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

6
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 64 publications
(60 citation statements)
references
References 90 publications
1
55
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Distinction between medium‐ and high‐risk levels depends upon setting a ‘threshold’ value, which is typically obtained through risk assessment area‐specific ‘calibration’ subject to availability of a representative sample size (i.e. number of screened species), which was recently estimated at n = 15–20 (Vilizzi et al, ). For the purposes of this study, with regard to the CCA component of the screening process, current predictions for the RSA suggest an increase in SST between 0.5 and 1.4°C and salinity increases of up to 18 ppt by 2050 (Vaughan et al, ; Wabnitz et al, ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Distinction between medium‐ and high‐risk levels depends upon setting a ‘threshold’ value, which is typically obtained through risk assessment area‐specific ‘calibration’ subject to availability of a representative sample size (i.e. number of screened species), which was recently estimated at n = 15–20 (Vilizzi et al, ). For the purposes of this study, with regard to the CCA component of the screening process, current predictions for the RSA suggest an increase in SST between 0.5 and 1.4°C and salinity increases of up to 18 ppt by 2050 (Vaughan et al, ; Wabnitz et al, ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To guide this process, considerable research has focussed on developing the widely applied Fish Invasiveness Screening Kit (FISK) which evaluates invasion risk (Copp 2013). Retrospective assessments of the FISK have found the tool relatively robust in predicting successful invaders (Vilizzi et al 2019).…”
Section: Piscivorous Freshwater Fishes In Connected Aquatic Ecosysmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Due to the enormous number of species that were evaluated, particular families were divided among authors. While the calculation of a RAM score is not subjective and the final score is a result of mathematical procedures with given rules, the final value of the AS-ISK score for the same species can differ when species are evaluated by several authors [35,36]. We tried to adjust this by holding three meetings of the authors prior to evaluation, where unification of procedure and clarifying specific issues were discussed.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%