2011
DOI: 10.1007/s13595-011-0016-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A growth and yield model for even-aged Pinus brutia Ten. stands in Syria

Abstract: International audienc

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
20
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

4
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
3
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Decreasing period factor decreases the prediction for larger diameters associated with later periods, implying that although the fixed part of the mixed-effects model seems unrealistic, the full model may predict realistic growths. This result verifies the conclusion that it may be unwise to use the fixed part of mixed-effects models in growth simulators (e.g., Temesgen et al 2008;Garber et al 2009;Pukkala et al 2009;Shater et al 2011;Groom et al 2012;Heiðarsson and Pukkala 2012;de-Miguel et al 2012;de-Miguel et al 2013). As discussed by Burkhart and Tomé (2012) it would be better to refit the model without random parameters.…”
Section: Diameter Increment and Survival Modelssupporting
confidence: 78%
“…Decreasing period factor decreases the prediction for larger diameters associated with later periods, implying that although the fixed part of the mixed-effects model seems unrealistic, the full model may predict realistic growths. This result verifies the conclusion that it may be unwise to use the fixed part of mixed-effects models in growth simulators (e.g., Temesgen et al 2008;Garber et al 2009;Pukkala et al 2009;Shater et al 2011;Groom et al 2012;Heiðarsson and Pukkala 2012;de-Miguel et al 2012;de-Miguel et al 2013). As discussed by Burkhart and Tomé (2012) it would be better to refit the model without random parameters.…”
Section: Diameter Increment and Survival Modelssupporting
confidence: 78%
“…Anamorphic curves were extracted from the guide curve, using the maximum height reached at 10 years as the reference age [28] for this study.…”
Section: Site Indexmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several growth and yield simulators are driven by a model that predicts dominant height as a function of stand age and site index (e.g., Shater et al 2011;Guzmán et al 2012). Use of the dominant height model assumes that dominant height is not reduced in thinning.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%