2012
DOI: 10.1007/s00170-012-4316-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A hierarchical fuzzy axiomatic design methodology for ergonomic compatibility evaluation of advanced manufacturing technology

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
18
0
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
18
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Modern digital HMI has numerous characteristics, such as information complexity (Yockey 2002), structure complexity (Zhang 2012), task complexity (Liu and Li 2012) and complex environment (Maldonado et al 2013). Operators must control a variety of devices in a specific manufacturing environment.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Modern digital HMI has numerous characteristics, such as information complexity (Yockey 2002), structure complexity (Zhang 2012), task complexity (Liu and Li 2012) and complex environment (Maldonado et al 2013). Operators must control a variety of devices in a specific manufacturing environment.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For this, the Theory of Axiomatic Design extended by , Helander and Lin (2002) and adopted by Karwowski (2001 was also evolved. For this approach a Hierarchical Fuzzy Axiomatic Design Survey for Compatibility Evaluation of AMT was designed based on a pragmatic perspective and a large amount of literature that was reviewed and presented in Maldonado et al (2009), Maldonado et al (2013). This evaluation approach can be adapted to be immersed into a Lean-Six Sigma framework.…”
Section: Fuzzy Axiomatic Design Methodologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The design goals, i.e. DR for the seven criteria are decided while using a five point linguistic scale set as least poor (LP), least fair (LF), least good (LG), least very good (LVG) and least excellent (LE) with their corresponding TFNs as (0,10,10), (2,10,10), (4,10,10), (6,10,10) and (8,10,10) respectively (Maldonado et al 2013). The selection committee has unanimously deci ded on the DRs of the seven criteria of strategic skills (C 1 ), process management skills (C 2 ), team skills (C 3 ), decision making skills (C 4 ), behavioural skills (C 5 ), negotiation skills (C 6 ) and quantitative skills (C 7 ) as LE, LE, LG, LE, LG, LVG and LVG respectively.…”
Section: Illustrative Problemmentioning
confidence: 99%