2016
DOI: 10.3844/ajassp.2016.439.450
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Hybrid Decision-Making Model for Maintenance Prioritization in Health Care Systems

Abstract: Clinical engineering departments have to establish and continuously regulate a Medical Equipment Management Program (MEMP) to ensure a high reliability and safety of their critical medical devices. Asset criticality assessment is an essential element of reliability centered maintenance and risk-based maintenance, especially when enormous various devices exist and the worst failure consequences are not evident. This paper presents a new risk-based prioritization framework for maintenance decisions. We propose a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
10
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Res. Public Health China Pollution Choice Literature Specialists ITI-TOPSIS Mahfoud et al [ 81 ] Am. J. Appl.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Res. Public Health China Pollution Choice Literature Specialists ITI-TOPSIS Mahfoud et al [ 81 ] Am. J. Appl.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Medical Equipment Management Programs (MEMPs) have been established by healthcare organizations to ensure the safety, reliability and performance level of medical devices [28]. The basic services such as inspection, preventive maintenance, and testing of medical devices are the essential tasks of MEMPs.…”
Section: The Priority Of Medical Devices In Maintenance Management Programsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite all the efforts done to enhance medical equipment prioritization process, the group decision-making issue has been overlooked. Healthcare organizations are usually a multiexpert decision-aiding environments, where we often have to deal with different judgments of a multidisciplinary decision makers (DMs) with different experiences and knowledge (Mahfoud et al, 2016a). So, multiexperts evaluations should be considered rather than the sole expert's judgments to support the interactive group learning of a problem.…”
Section: Medical Equipment Prioritization: Mcdm Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%