2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.119954
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A hybrid framework integrating rough-fuzzy best-worst method to identify and evaluate user activity-oriented service requirement for smart product service system

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
21
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 59 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
0
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…While, in this paper, a new fuzzy-based MCDM method is employed, the FBWM is the extension of the basic Best-Worst method with consideration of the fuzziness of decision makers, which reduces the number of pairwise comparisons among criteria and improves the consistency of pairwise comparisons [23]. Because of the merits, the FBWM has been employed in many issues, such as the evaluation on service requirement of smart product service system [24], the selection of sustainable suppliers [25], national-scale landslide susceptibility mapping [26], and a strategy canvas drawing [27]. The fuzzy comprehensive evaluation method is also a commonly used MCDM method, which is based on the fuzzy set.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While, in this paper, a new fuzzy-based MCDM method is employed, the FBWM is the extension of the basic Best-Worst method with consideration of the fuzziness of decision makers, which reduces the number of pairwise comparisons among criteria and improves the consistency of pairwise comparisons [23]. Because of the merits, the FBWM has been employed in many issues, such as the evaluation on service requirement of smart product service system [24], the selection of sustainable suppliers [25], national-scale landslide susceptibility mapping [26], and a strategy canvas drawing [27]. The fuzzy comprehensive evaluation method is also a commonly used MCDM method, which is based on the fuzzy set.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These characteristics refer to the smart capabilities of service components (e.g. perceptible, communicable, diagnosable, predictable and optimizable) (Chen et al, 2020b) and the complex interaction (e.g. material flow, function correlation, data flow, information flow and wisdom flow) between the service components (Song et al, 2015;Zheng et al, 2018).…”
Section: Research Gapsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The domain of physical SCP operation is implemented to realize the specific SCP's function that supports both the cyber service and physical service. The domain of cyber PSS operation is established to achieve smart functions (Chen et al, 2020b) such as real-time perception, interactive connection, dynamic monitor, informative diagnostic, accurate prediction, optimal decision-making, and smart prescription, etc. It includes four sub-domains, namely, SCP data management domain, SCP digital twin domain, data analytic domain and cyber service domain.…”
Section: Sps Components Identification With Cps-based Smart Product Service Blueprintmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It is worth noting that Kansei engineering is more concerned with human emotional factors. Reviewing the literature indicates that the majority of emotional evaluations of the aircraft cockpit are carried out with conventional perceptual engineering research methods, including the Delphi expert consultation (Gbededo and Liyanage, 2020), focus groups (Axon et al ., 2020), quality function deployment (QFD; Pandey, 2020), and fuzzy evaluation (Chen et al ., 2020). Because these methods rely heavily on the human selection and expert experience for selecting evaluation indicators and preparing the judgment matrix.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%