2012
DOI: 10.1080/17509653.2012.10671234
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A hybrid MCDM model for resilient supplier selection

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
37
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 54 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
37
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is true that the existing research have shown promising potential of MCDA methods and fuzzy techniques in supplier selection problems (Gan et al, 2019;Haldar et al, 2012Haldar et al, , 2014Hasan, Shohag, Azeem, Paul, & Management, 2015;Jiang, Faiz, & Hassan, 2018). However, there are limitations of the state-of-the-art literatures: (i) to the best of our knowledge, no existing research extends F-MADM framework in supplier evaluation problems leveraging large number of information (time series and graphical information), (ii) no prior study investigated F-MADM approach for evaluating suppliers' performance from resilience and logistics 4.0 perspective, simultaneously, and (iii) it is not clear how fuzzy based TOPSIS can be extended to process inherent uncertainty in decision relevant information associated with both the quantitative and qualitative attributes.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is true that the existing research have shown promising potential of MCDA methods and fuzzy techniques in supplier selection problems (Gan et al, 2019;Haldar et al, 2012Haldar et al, , 2014Hasan, Shohag, Azeem, Paul, & Management, 2015;Jiang, Faiz, & Hassan, 2018). However, there are limitations of the state-of-the-art literatures: (i) to the best of our knowledge, no existing research extends F-MADM framework in supplier evaluation problems leveraging large number of information (time series and graphical information), (ii) no prior study investigated F-MADM approach for evaluating suppliers' performance from resilience and logistics 4.0 perspective, simultaneously, and (iii) it is not clear how fuzzy based TOPSIS can be extended to process inherent uncertainty in decision relevant information associated with both the quantitative and qualitative attributes.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The literature on resilient supplier selection is summarized in Table 1. Haldar, Ray, Banerjee and Ghosh [20] developed a resilient supplier selection model using AHP-QFD method to rate the suppliers. They used five resilience criteria (density, complexity, node criticality, responsiveness and re-engineering) for the supplier selection process.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus it crucial to provide a reliable level of resilience to the supply side to protect such shortages especially during HILP events [9].Several studies have been conducted to consider resilience in the supply chain [8,10,11]. The concept of resilience in specific to the supplier selection problem has also been discussed by several authors [12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25]. Most of these studies focused on multiple sourcing and operational performance of suppliers.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Integrated a new hybrid fuzzy MCDM approach based on the use of DEMATEL, ANP and TOPSIS are then proposed to evaluate the green suppliers. Haldar et al, 2012 AHP, TOPSIS, subjective factor measures (SFM), and objective factor measure (OFM).…”
Section: Tablementioning
confidence: 99%