2011
DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.1105.3407
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Koszul category of representations of finitary Lie algebras

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
16
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
2
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Let G be the group of all linear operators on V ⊕ W that preserve the pairing (•, •), and that commute with P . Then G is a subgroup of the group of automorphisms of g. Like in the case of gl(∞) (see Theorem 3.4 in [2]) , the large annihilator condition implies that for any γ ∈ G, the twisted module M γ is isomorphic to M. Let W denote the normalizer of h in G. Then for any s ∈ W, if M is a highest weight module with respect to s(b) it is a highest weight module with respect to b. Lemma 3.10. Every simple module in Trep g is isomorphic to V (λ, µ) or ΠV (λ, µ).…”
Section: The Category O ′mentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Let G be the group of all linear operators on V ⊕ W that preserve the pairing (•, •), and that commute with P . Then G is a subgroup of the group of automorphisms of g. Like in the case of gl(∞) (see Theorem 3.4 in [2]) , the large annihilator condition implies that for any γ ∈ G, the twisted module M γ is isomorphic to M. Let W denote the normalizer of h in G. Then for any s ∈ W, if M is a highest weight module with respect to s(b) it is a highest weight module with respect to b. Lemma 3.10. Every simple module in Trep g is isomorphic to V (λ, µ) or ΠV (λ, µ).…”
Section: The Category O ′mentioning
confidence: 98%
“…In [2] it is proven that these categories have enough injective objects and that every object has a finite injective resolution. Furthermore, the algebra of endomorphisms of an injecive cogenerator is described explicitly.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This category is studied in detail in [GS], where it is denoted Trep(g); see [GS,Definition 3.2] for the precise definition. (Similar categories for classical Lie algebras were studied in [DPS,PSe,PSt,SS1].) We will require some results from [GS], which we now review.…”
Section: The Generic Categorymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similarly, we define Rep alg (gl), the category of (wide) algebraic representations, to be the tensor subcategory of Rep(gl) generated by V, V[1], V * , and V * [1]. The category Rep nalg (gl) is equivalent to the category of algebraic representations of gl ∞ studied in [DPS,PSe,PSt,SS2]. It is not semisimple.…”
Section: Polynomial Representations Of Gl Letmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The orthosymplectic Lie superalgebra osp is the stabilizer of this form inside of gl(W). We define the category Rep alg (osp) of (wide) algebraic representations of osp to be the subcategory of Rep(osp) generated by W. As in the gl case, there is also a narrow category, which is equivalent to the category of algebraic representations of the infinite orthogonal category; this category was studied in [DPS,PSe,PSt,SS2]. Any element of gl = gl(V) acts on W = V ⊕ V * and preserves the form.…”
Section: Polynomial Representations Of Gl Letmentioning
confidence: 99%