2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.bios.2013.11.041
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A label-free electrochemical biosensor for highly sensitive and selective detection of DNA via a dual-amplified strategy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
12
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 63 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
1
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Using the cascade signal amplification strategy of the HCR and the enzyme-induced metallization improved the detection sensitivity down to 10 pM, which is about 100-fold lower than that of the conventional unamplified homogeneous assays (Hu et al 2014). The detection sensitivity of this method could be compared to other amplification strategies (Gao and Li 2013; Kong et al 2014; Luo et al 2012; Zhang et al 2013), in which the detection limits were reported commonly in the range of fM to nM. For our method, when the concentration of the T DNA reached down to the 0.1–1 pM range, it was difficult to distinguish the colour change by the naked eyes.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Using the cascade signal amplification strategy of the HCR and the enzyme-induced metallization improved the detection sensitivity down to 10 pM, which is about 100-fold lower than that of the conventional unamplified homogeneous assays (Hu et al 2014). The detection sensitivity of this method could be compared to other amplification strategies (Gao and Li 2013; Kong et al 2014; Luo et al 2012; Zhang et al 2013), in which the detection limits were reported commonly in the range of fM to nM. For our method, when the concentration of the T DNA reached down to the 0.1–1 pM range, it was difficult to distinguish the colour change by the naked eyes.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Due to the low abundance of disease specific DNA and the complexity of the biological samples, highly sensitive and selective approaches for DNA detection are required in clinical applications. To meet this challenge, many methods have been well developed, for example, electrochemical sensing (Kong et al 2014; Liu et al 2013a), fluorescence (Hu et al 2013; Niu et al 2010) and chemiluminescence detection (Li and He 2009; Wang et al 2013c), and föster resonance energy resonance energy transfer (FRET) (Liu et al 2013b; Su et al 2014; Xing et al 2013). To further boost the performance, signal amplification strategies with various enzymes are usually adopted, such as exonuclease III-assisted amplification (Gao and Li 2013; Luo et al 2012), rolling circle amplification (Xu et al 2012), and strand displacement amplification (Wang et al 2011; Zhang et al 2013).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The regression equation was I ∆F = 105.1 logC + 1709 (R: 0.993), where ∆F = F–F0 (F: fluorescence signal of methylated DNA; F0: blank signal), I∆F is the relative fluorescence intensity and C is the methylated DNA concentration. Notably, LOD was 0.4 fM (based on 3σ/slope) [54]. As evidenced by both low LOD and wide linear range, this ultrasensitive fluorescent biosensor can be applied to detect low-level DNA methylation.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To date, various electrochemical DNA biosensors have been reported. To our knowledge, developing of label-free electrochemical DNA biosensors has been proved to be one successful method to directly detect target DNA [9][10][11]. As is well known, toluidine blue (TB) is a kind of phenothiazine dye and has good reversible electron transfer ability.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%