2023
DOI: 10.1016/j.bioelechem.2023.108446
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A label-free electrochemical immunosensor based on 11-mercaptoundecanoic acid grafted chitosan and poly(N-methylaniline) for the detection of carcinoembryonic antigen

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 65 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The limit of detection (LOD), calculated based on a signal-to-noise ratio of 3 (S/N = 3), is 6.3 pg mL −1 . A comparison between the determination of CEA using different methods is demonstrated in Table S2 ( Supplementary Materials ) [ 51 , 52 , 53 , 54 , 55 , 56 , 57 ]. The LOD was lower than that obtained using square wave voltammetry [ 51 ], chronoamperometric [ 52 ] or electrochemiluminescence [ 53 ] detection through sandwich immunoassay, or chemiluminescence determination based on aptamer functionalized magnetic silicon composite (Apt/AuNPs/PDDA-SiO 2 @Fe 3 O 4 ) [ 54 ], or EIS determination based on the immobilization of the Ab on the poly(ethyleneglycol)-NH 2 -connected, pyrenebutyric acid-functionalized, graphene/gold nanoparticle-modified GCE (BSA/Ab/AuNPs/PPYGR/GCE) [ 55 ], or an 11-mercaptoundecanoic-acid-grafted chitosan and poly(N-methylaniline)-modified screen-printed carbon electrode (BSA/Ab/tCHI/dPNMA/SPCE) [ 56 ], but higher than that of an aptasensor based on Fe-MOF-supported self-polymerized dopamine-decorated Au NPs (NH 2 -aptamer/Au@PDA@Fe-MOF/GCE) [ 57 ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The limit of detection (LOD), calculated based on a signal-to-noise ratio of 3 (S/N = 3), is 6.3 pg mL −1 . A comparison between the determination of CEA using different methods is demonstrated in Table S2 ( Supplementary Materials ) [ 51 , 52 , 53 , 54 , 55 , 56 , 57 ]. The LOD was lower than that obtained using square wave voltammetry [ 51 ], chronoamperometric [ 52 ] or electrochemiluminescence [ 53 ] detection through sandwich immunoassay, or chemiluminescence determination based on aptamer functionalized magnetic silicon composite (Apt/AuNPs/PDDA-SiO 2 @Fe 3 O 4 ) [ 54 ], or EIS determination based on the immobilization of the Ab on the poly(ethyleneglycol)-NH 2 -connected, pyrenebutyric acid-functionalized, graphene/gold nanoparticle-modified GCE (BSA/Ab/AuNPs/PPYGR/GCE) [ 55 ], or an 11-mercaptoundecanoic-acid-grafted chitosan and poly(N-methylaniline)-modified screen-printed carbon electrode (BSA/Ab/tCHI/dPNMA/SPCE) [ 56 ], but higher than that of an aptasensor based on Fe-MOF-supported self-polymerized dopamine-decorated Au NPs (NH 2 -aptamer/Au@PDA@Fe-MOF/GCE) [ 57 ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%