2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.geomorph.2005.07.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A landslide susceptibility model using the Analytical Hierarchy Process method and multivariate statistics in perialpine Slovenia

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
159
0
25

Year Published

2006
2006
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 378 publications
(186 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
2
159
0
25
Order By: Relevance
“…The AHP has been extensively applied on decision-making problems (Saaty and Vargas 2001), and only recently, some research has been carried out to apply AHP to landslide susceptibility assessment. Komac (2006) made multivariate statistical processing to obtain several landslide susceptibility models with data at 1:50,000 and 1:100,000 scales. Based on the statistical results, several landslide susceptibility models were developed using the AHP method.…”
Section: National Landslide Risk Assessment Model Design Issues and Omentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The AHP has been extensively applied on decision-making problems (Saaty and Vargas 2001), and only recently, some research has been carried out to apply AHP to landslide susceptibility assessment. Komac (2006) made multivariate statistical processing to obtain several landslide susceptibility models with data at 1:50,000 and 1:100,000 scales. Based on the statistical results, several landslide susceptibility models were developed using the AHP method.…”
Section: National Landslide Risk Assessment Model Design Issues and Omentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite this importance, there has been little research into methods of weighting and standardization of indicators for disaster risk analysis so far. Castellanos Abella and van Westen (2007) applied multi-criteria evaluation techniques, while Komac (2006) and Yoshimatsu and Abe (2006) applied analytical hierarchical process methods, yet restricted to landslide susceptibility. The process of weighting vulnerability indicators involves the political and societal level and thus goes beyond scientific responsibility and thus should be undertaken in discussion with public authorities.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among these units, except for a less number of authors who make use of slope units (Carrara et al, 1991(Carrara et al, , 1995Komac, 2006;Rossi et al, 2010) and homogeneous land units (Can et al, 2005;Falaschi et al, 2009), cells matrix is the most widely used land unit by the authors considered (Bernknopf et al, 1988;Gorsevski et al, 2000;Dai and Lee, 2002;Ohlmacher and Davis, 2003;Dai et al, 2004;Ayalew and Yamagishi, 2005;Chau and Chan, 2005;Yesilnacar and Topal, 2005;Van Den Eeckhaut et al, 2006;Greco et al, 2007;Chen and Wang, 2007;Garcia-Rodriguez et al, 2008;Nefeslioglu et al, 2008;Mathew et al, 2009;Sorriso-Valvo et al, 2009;Nandi and Shakoor, 2009;Chauhan et al, 2010;Erener et al, 2010;Yalcin et al, 2011;Choi et al, 2012). Authors almost homogeneously perform the fitting and weight assessment steps for independent variables and for the variables of analysis application (assessment of P (y)).…”
Section: R Greco and M Sorriso-valvo: Influence Of Management Of Vamentioning
confidence: 99%