2012
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-31709-5_16
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Linguistic Approach to Structural Analysis in Prospective Studies

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0
3

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
13
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…It is a tool that structures collective knowledge and consensus; it requires the participation of a working group made up of experts. Although it is widely used across different areas of study, it is important to mention its shortcomings due to the subjectiveness of the information used in this process, which can cause imprecise results (Villacorta et al 2012). To have enough consensus among experts, there was a special emphasis placed on the role of experts in their organizations, as they were required to have high management positions in their organizations.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is a tool that structures collective knowledge and consensus; it requires the participation of a working group made up of experts. Although it is widely used across different areas of study, it is important to mention its shortcomings due to the subjectiveness of the information used in this process, which can cause imprecise results (Villacorta et al 2012). To have enough consensus among experts, there was a special emphasis placed on the role of experts in their organizations, as they were required to have high management positions in their organizations.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This scheme uses fixed numerical membership values 0, 0.33, 0.67, and 1.0 to indicate "fully out", "more out than in", "more in than out", and "fully in", respectively [37]. Such a scheme is especially useful for the situations where providers; in environmental trend analysis, for the effectiveness of information system; waste management [43,44]. In this article, the computational inputs to this impact matrix are intended as expert decision support.…”
Section: Transformative Classificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This method is performed in three steps: definitions of related variables, identification of relationships among the variables, and identification of key variables among the entire set of variables presented by the experts [22]. Definition of the variables related to a system is a complicated process undertaken upon different experts' ideas, brainstorming and library studies [23]. In identifying the relationship between variables, norm values of 0-3 are assigned.…”
Section: Mic-mac Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%