A liquid profession: An ecological approach to the theory and knowledge that underpin the practice of public relations

Abstract

This is a conceptual essay that explores the concept of knowledge as it relates to public relations (PR). It suggests an ecological knowledge architecture as a lens through which to understand the theories and concepts that support practice. It does so by drawing on the work of Zygmunt Bauman and his reflections on liquid modernity to inform and shape thinking and uses it as a thread to help synthesise scholarship from knowledge, competency and career scholarship and debates around professionalisation. It argues that by subdividing knowledge into explanatory, interventionist and practice principles greater clarity can be given to the know-how (functional skills) and know-that (theoretical knowledge) of PR. In addition, by overlaying a postmodernist and liquid concept to this tripartite division of knowledge, PR can be well placed to take advantage of the change in careers and capabilities necessary for work in the 21st century.

Towards a New Understanding of Masculine Habitus and Women and Leadership in Public Relations

“…The continuing emphasis on PR as a strategic management function, despite the gendering of the field (Fitch, 2015), has failed to acknowledge the fluidity outlined by Bowman and Hendy (2019) We recognise that fluidity in the work landscape challenges existing ideas about women and leadership.…”

Relações públicas, pós-verdade e grandes desafios: uma melhor pesquisa para o valor social

“…O modus operandi moderno (ou modernista) das RP -construído sobre uma crença cartesiano-newtoniana na verdade científica, metodologia quantitativa e gestão científica (McKie, 2001, p. 80) -não apenas determina como a educação e a prática evoluem sua "troika familiar -um corpo de conhecimento, ética e certificação" (Bowman;Hendy, 2019, p. 336; tradução nossa), mas também como estes são aplicados na prática em circunstâncias difíceis, como crises. As RP possuem um ramo inteiro dedicado às crises Holladay, 2012;Fearn-Banks, 2001;Regester;Larkin, 2008;Tachkova;Coombs, 2022).…”