2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.eswa.2009.11.031
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A MCDM approach for sourcing strategy mix decision in IT projects

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
19
0
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 69 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 62 publications
0
19
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This also helps managers to derive local and global weights for each criterion to find the optimal portfolio. The best three criteria are: "Genomics, improved diagnostics and biosystematics" (D 11 ), "Use of agrochemicals" (D 13 ), and "Space technology for mapping and monitoring pest population and development of weather based forewarning in GIS environment" (D 34 ). Next, grey MABAC shows us how to aggregate DMs' judgments and evaluate and select a project portfolio in socially responsible National Agro Research Institutes.…”
Section: Conclusion Boundaries and Future Directionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This also helps managers to derive local and global weights for each criterion to find the optimal portfolio. The best three criteria are: "Genomics, improved diagnostics and biosystematics" (D 11 ), "Use of agrochemicals" (D 13 ), and "Space technology for mapping and monitoring pest population and development of weather based forewarning in GIS environment" (D 34 ). Next, grey MABAC shows us how to aggregate DMs' judgments and evaluate and select a project portfolio in socially responsible National Agro Research Institutes.…”
Section: Conclusion Boundaries and Future Directionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to estimate the relative influence in these structures from which the overall answer is derived, both judgment and logic are used. In recent years, many scholars have explained the ANP methodology and have applied ANP to multifarious decision making problems (e.g., Bayazit 2006;Bu-Qammaz et al 2009;Chang et al 2009;De Ambroggi and Trucco 2011;Ho et al 2011;Hung 2011;Karpak and Topcu 2010;Lin and Hsu 2011;Liou and Chuang 2010;Liu et al 2011;Ming-Lang et al 2009;Onut et al 2008;Pourebrahim et al 2010;Tsai et al 2010).…”
Section: The Anp Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The method can divide multiple criteria into a cause-and-effect group and an intelligible structural model, to better understand causal relationships to plot a NRM (Ho et al 2011;Hung 2011;Liou and Chuang 2010;Tsai et al 2010;Yang and Tzeng 2010). The method can be divided into four steps as follows:…”
Section: The Dematel Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In terms of advantages, it allows for dependence and includes independence and has the ability to prioritize groups or clusters of elements. Besides, it can support complex, networked decision-making with various intangible criteria [69]. ANP is often utilized in project selection, product planning, green supply chain management, and optimal scheduling problems and also transportation.…”
Section: Analytic Network Process (Anp)mentioning
confidence: 99%