2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.paid.2009.08.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A meta-analysis on 2D:4D and athletic prowess: Substantial relationships but neither hand out-predicts the other

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

13
156
3
5

Year Published

2010
2010
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 171 publications
(177 citation statements)
references
References 65 publications
13
156
3
5
Order By: Relevance
“…Manning (2002) and Lutchmaya et al (2004) found that the 2D:4D ratios of the both hands of the males were lower than those of the females. The results of the studies are similar and they support the findings in the literature regarding the fact that the negative correlation between 2D:4D ratios and prenatal testosterone is higher in males than females (Manning et al, 1998;Hönekopp and Schuster, 2010;Gökbel et al, 1992).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Manning (2002) and Lutchmaya et al (2004) found that the 2D:4D ratios of the both hands of the males were lower than those of the females. The results of the studies are similar and they support the findings in the literature regarding the fact that the negative correlation between 2D:4D ratios and prenatal testosterone is higher in males than females (Manning et al, 1998;Hönekopp and Schuster, 2010;Gökbel et al, 1992).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…It is suggested that prenatal testosterone has a negative correlation with 2D:4D; on the other hand, prenatal estrogen has a positive correlation with 2D:4D (Manning et al, 1998). This relationship is negatively correlated with sportive performance Hönekopp and Schuster , 2010). The average of 2D:4D in males is lower than that of females (Manning et al, 1998;Van Honka et al, 2011;Hönekopp and Watson , 2011;Phelps, 1952).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While indirect methods are considerably more practical, they increase the measurement error associated with 2D:4D estimation and further weaken the correlation with early hormonal exposure. For all these reasons, associations between digit ratios and behavioral traits can be expected to be rather small in size; a notable exception is the association between 2D:4D and measures of athletic prowess, with a meta-analytic effect size of about r= −0.26 (Hönekopp and Schuster 2010).…”
Section: The 2d:4d Digit Ratio As a Marker Of Early Exposure To Sex Hmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The fact that 2D:4D ratio is negatively associated with physical strength and sportive performance (Hönekopp & Schuster, 2010), it can be explained as a biological marker for performance in various sports (Manning et al 1998;Hönekopp & Schuster, 2010). The ratio of finger lengths to each other was determined in the mother's womb and did not change in the adolescent period or in the adult period (Çelik et al 2010).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%