A Meta‐Analysis on the Return on Investment of Geospatial Data and Systems: A Multi‐Country Perspective

Abstract

The availability, quality and accessibility of Geographic Information (GI) have significant socio-economic and environmental benefits, but the collection and maintenance of GI require substantial investments. Cost-benefit assessments (CBAs) attempt to justify the costs of geospatial data investments, applying different methodologies and focusing on diverse areas. Therefore, the Returns on Investment (ROI) vary considerably across studies, regions and sectors. The objective of this study is to explain some of the variation in the average ROI of GI by conducting a meta-analysis of 82 cost-benefit assessments between 1994 and 2013. In a first step, CBAs are systematically reviewed and relevant information is extracted. Particular emphasis is given to investment conditions and study characteristics. In a second step, multivariate regression methods are used to assess the size, significance and direction of individual effects. The results suggest that regional factors have the largest impact on the profitability of GI. Returns in Australia and New Zealand, for example, are four times larger than in Europe. In addition, small-scale regional investments have a 2.5 times lower return than large-scale international investments. Overall, the expected benefits of GI investments are approximately 3.2 times larger than the costs

Applications of 3D City Models: State of the Art Review

“…It may also be a valuable input to research work that investigate the economic value of 3D geoinformation [46, [389][390][391]. National mapping agencies (NMAs) may find it beneficial for defining use case scenarios and setting the proper requirements when procuring 3D datasets.…”

A scientometric analysis of selected GIScience journals

“…After adjusting the data according to a nation's wealth to derive the efficiency, another ranking is exposed where the US ranks 22nd. Such analysis benchmarks a nation's output and efficiency, thus its extension would be valuable as an input in scientific policies that would help to improve GIScience output and could be related to the research on the economic value of geoinformation (Castelein et al 2010, Bernknopf and Shapiro 2015, Trapp et al 2015. Remote Sensing.…”

Benefits of earth observation data for conservation planning in the case of European wetland biodiversity

“…Trapp et al . (2012) showed that the financial benefits achieved by using EO data from a range of studies were on average four times larger than the costs.…”

“…2008; Trapp et al . 2012), however, there have been no comprehensive assessments of their economic, social and environmental benefits to date. The development of a high-quality, timely and comprehensive global earth observation system of systems (GEOSS), to include a global biodiversity observation system, would create a mechanism to integrate biodiversity data with other observations more effectively, leverage investments in local to national research and observation projects, and provide networks for global analysis and modelling.…”