“…Almost half a century ago, American psychiatrist Phillip Resnick (1969) formulated a typology of filicide to facilitate further understanding of the phenomenon. His paper is still widely cited, and although several scholars have proposed new typologies, none of these has reached widespread use (see, for example, references [Biron & Reynald, 2015;Mugavin, 2005;Putkonen et al, 2016]). Five categories were identified by Resnick: (i) the altruistic filicide, which is characterized by the urge to relieve (real or imagined) suffering; (ii) the acutely psychotic filicide, in which the offender is acting under the influence of psychosis; (iii) the unwanted child filicide, in which the offender primarily strives to rid him-or herself of the child; (iv) the accidental filicide, which is characterized by the unintentional use of excessive violence by a battering parent; and last, (v) the spouse-revenge filicide, in which the offender kills primarily to retaliate against a former or current intimate partner (Resnick, 1969).…”