2004
DOI: 10.1093/ptr/kph008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A method of choosing CCRT scorers

Abstract: This study compared interjudge agreement in 2 sample cases in which both experienced as well as inexperienced scorers were used. Scorers were given only a single page of core conflictual relationship theme (CCRT) instructions to help them learn the method. The results in both cases suggest that there was significantly greater interjudge agreement among experienced CCRT scorers compared with inexperienced scorers.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
6
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
1
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Each time they fi rst coded an RE separately and then met to obtain consensus codes. Weighted coeffi cients of agreement, which were calculated based on the weights commonly used in CCRT studies [22] , indicated acceptable correspondence between both coders for the initial codes (Ws = 0.67, ROs = 0.69, RSs = 0.69) [23] . Categories and codes for which the initial coding was different were discussed until consensus coding was obtained.…”
Section: Instruments and Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Each time they fi rst coded an RE separately and then met to obtain consensus codes. Weighted coeffi cients of agreement, which were calculated based on the weights commonly used in CCRT studies [22] , indicated acceptable correspondence between both coders for the initial codes (Ws = 0.67, ROs = 0.69, RSs = 0.69) [23] . Categories and codes for which the initial coding was different were discussed until consensus coding was obtained.…”
Section: Instruments and Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As noted above, kappa was shown in the present study, whereas weighted kappa is more permissive of varying measures, and therefore as a rule, presents higher kappa values. A previous study showed a weighted kappa for the CCRT pattern in total [26] while the others (see Table 1), showed kappa or weighted kappa for the separate components. In the present study the mean kappa value for the total CCRT pattern resulted in moderate reliability (0.41).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 80%
“…The three CCRT components occur in association with each other, thus creating a linked 'sequence' in which the wishes and responses of the subject comprise a call-and-answer pattern, a kind of dialogue (Mitchell, 1995). It is true that not every patient links his or her relational components together and places every component in a sequence (Luborsky, 1998;Luborsky et al, 2004). For this reason, we decided to analyze only the RD, which had wishes at the start of the sequence, since in these cases the reactions of other people, and even those of the patient herself, are the result of a desire, need, or intention of hers.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%