1986
DOI: 10.1016/0022-1694(86)90097-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A method of measuring soil moisture by time-domain reflectometry

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

7
282
1
35

Year Published

2000
2000
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 439 publications
(328 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
7
282
1
35
Order By: Relevance
“…Seedlings, which did not yet have cotyledons, were wilting, or damaged were excluded from the measurement. Complementary to this, we characterized the water retention capacity of the respective substrates bare soil, soil with inactive grass tussocks, and soil with active tussocks using time‐domain reflectometry (Ledieu, De Ridder, De Clerck, & Dautrebande, 1986; Robinson, Jones, Wraith, Or, & Friedman, 2002). Each pot was measured at 7 hr in the morning with three repeats over 10 days after a simulated rain event of 10 mm.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Seedlings, which did not yet have cotyledons, were wilting, or damaged were excluded from the measurement. Complementary to this, we characterized the water retention capacity of the respective substrates bare soil, soil with inactive grass tussocks, and soil with active tussocks using time‐domain reflectometry (Ledieu, De Ridder, De Clerck, & Dautrebande, 1986; Robinson, Jones, Wraith, Or, & Friedman, 2002). Each pot was measured at 7 hr in the morning with three repeats over 10 days after a simulated rain event of 10 mm.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…O modelo cúbico apresentou maior coeficiente de determinação e menores DV de ε, medidos pela TDR e estimados pelos modelos, seguido pelo modelo de Roth et al (1990), do qual diferiu significativamente tanto pelos R 2 como pelas médias dos DV (Quadro 5). Os coeficientes de determinação médios dos dois modelos diferiram dos demais, tendo o modelo de Malicki et al (1996) resultado no terceiro maior coeficiente de determinação médio, diferindo significativamente dos modelos de Whalley (1993), Ledieu et al (1986) (1) Médias de tratamentos seguidas por letras distintas, na coluna, diferem pelo teste de TuKey (P < 0,05).…”
Section: Resultsunclassified
“…O valor inicial de α foi de 0,5 conforme alguns autores (Topp et al, 1980;Ledieu et al, 1986;Roth et al, 1990;Malicki et al, 1996). Os valores de ε S , ε a e de ε w , adotados em todos os cálculos, foram 5, 1 e 77, respectivamente.…”
Section: Methodsunclassified
See 2 more Smart Citations