2020 IEEE 23rd International Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITSC) 2020
DOI: 10.1109/itsc45102.2020.9294310
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Method to Assess and Compare Proving Grounds in the Context of Automated Driving Systems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Driver assistance systems include FCW, AEB, LKA, or ESP. ADAS are maximum level 2 solutions according to SAE [2, 35,36]. They form the basis of higher-level systems.…”
Section: Normative and Unified Av Test Proceduresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Driver assistance systems include FCW, AEB, LKA, or ESP. ADAS are maximum level 2 solutions according to SAE [2, 35,36]. They form the basis of higher-level systems.…”
Section: Normative and Unified Av Test Proceduresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Advanced methods may significantly reduce the necessary testing time on proving grounds. However, the role of proving ground testing cannot be completely replaced [35].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%