2001
DOI: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.rpd.a006493
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Method to Assess Predominant Energies of Exposure in a Nuclear Research Centre - Saclay (France)

Abstract: A study of dosimetric errors is under way within an international collaborative study of cancer risk among workers in the nuclear industry. The objective is to quantify errors in the estimated photon doses to individual organs used for cancer risk estimation. One source of errors is the response of old dosemeters in workplace exposure conditions. As these conditions are not well known, the International Study must rely on expert estimations. This paper describes a method to assess the proportion of the dose fr… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
8
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Exposure characteristics, such as the type of radiation, its energy and the geometry of exposure, may have also resulted in uncertainties in the recorded doses. Those uncertainties were quantified by the IARC for a sample of dosimeters including types used at CEA and Cogema 11 12…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Exposure characteristics, such as the type of radiation, its energy and the geometry of exposure, may have also resulted in uncertainties in the recorded doses. Those uncertainties were quantified by the IARC for a sample of dosimeters including types used at CEA and Cogema 11 12…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We had no indication of major changes in the exposure conditions of the facilities and therefore, our assessment of exposure conditions remained unchanged (12). It should be emphasized that our initial assessment already accounted for large variations in exposure conditions (7).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Controlled experiments were conducted on phantoms to determine their response to different geometries and energies of exposure found in the facilities participating in the study. Next, panels of experts were convened to characterize typical exposures of workers at nuclear facilities in terms of photon energies and geometries (12). A database of correction factors was created to convert historical recorded dose values to estimates of organ doses for workers in each facility, adjusting for variations in dosimeter response to predominant energy and geometry of exposure (conditions of exposure), as well as yielding estimates of uncertainty (6, 7).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Errors from these sources were quantified and bias factors specific to the doses to each organ of interest calculated for each model of dosimeter used and by type of facility (nuclear power plants and mixed activities facilities) 11 12. Organ doses were derived by dividing recorded doses by the appropriate organ dose bias factor.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%