A Methodology for Assessing the Probability of Occurrence of Undesired Events in the Tietê–Paraná Inland Waterway Based on Expert Opinion

Abstract

The market share of Tietê–Paraná inland waterway (TPIW) in the transport matrix of the São Paulo state, Brazil, is currently only 0.6%, but it is expected to increase to 6% over the next 20 years. In this scenario, to identify and explore potential undesired events a risk assessment is necessary. Part of this involves assigning the probability of occurrence of events, which usually is accomplished by a frequentist approach. However, in many cases, this approach is not possible due to unavailable or nonrepresentative data. This is the case of the TPIW that even though an expressive accident history is available, a frequentist approach is not suitable due to differences between current operational conditions and those met in the past. Therefore, a subjective assessment is an option as allows for working independently of the historical data, thus delivering more reliable results. In this context, this article proposes a methodology for assessing the probability of occurrence of undesired events based on expert opinion combined with fuzzy analysis. This methodology defines a criterion to weighting the experts and, using the fuzzy logic, evaluates the similarities among the experts’ beliefs to be used in the aggregation process before the defuzzification that quantifies the probability of occurrence of the events based on the experts’ opinion. Moreover, the proposed methodology is applied to the real case of the TPIW and the results obtained from the elicited experts are compared with a frequentist approach evidencing the impact on the results when considering different interpretations of the probability.

An integrated environmental risk assessment framework for coal‐fired power plants: A fuzzy logic approach

“…Moreover, fuzzy‐based approaches are often the method of choice for handling uncertainties, including analyzing soft factors that are difficult to quantify (Loh et al., 2020; Matbouli et al., 2014). Consequently, fuzzy logic and expert judgments are widely used in several operational risk assessment studies such as in autonomous underwater vehicles (Brito & Dawson, 2020; Loh et al., 2020), in inland waterways (Martins et al., 2020), in nuclear power plants (Rastogi & Gabbar, 2013), and oil and gas industry (Mun, 2004). Also, fuzzy set theory has mainly been used in combination with probabilistic methods such as Monte Carlo analysis.…”

Shipping Accident Analysis in Restricted Waters: Lesson from the Suez Canal Blockage in 2021

“…In addition, the Functional Resonance Analysis Model (FRAM) was applied to analyse how shipboard operations cause accidents (Salihoglu and Besikci, 2021). Due to unavailable or nonrepresentative data, Martins et al (2020) proposed a methodology to assess and quantify the probabilities of occurrence of undesired events based on expert opinions combined with fuzzy analysis. In the light of Maritime Autonomous Surface Ships (MASS), several risk factors have been identified using qualitative methods (Chang et al, 2021;Fan et al, 2020a;Liu et al, 2022).…”

Methodology for Maritime Risk Assessment in Ports due to Meteo‐oceanographic Factors: The Case of the port of Suape, Brazil

“…Despite all such concerns about maritime transportation and life at sea, a review of the literature was conducted from databases of major scientific journals (“CAPES Portal de Periódicos,” a Brazilian national electronic library that aggregates high quality content; and Google Scholar) that resulted in 12 recent published research studies on methodologies for maritime risk assessment (MRA) (Baksh, Abbassi, Garaniya, & Khan, 2018; Cem Kuzu, Akyuz, & Arslan, 2019; Cho, Lee, & Moon, 2018; Goerlandt & Montewka, 2015; Gul, Celik, & Akyuz, 2017; IMO, 2018; John, Yang, Riahi, & Wang, 2016; Lam & Lassa, 2017; Martins, Pestana, & Droguett, 2020; Vander Hoorn & Knapp, 2015; Zhang et al., 2016; Zhang, Yan, Zhang, Yang, & Wang, 2016), and none of these focus on risk assessment in ports based on meteo‐oceanographic (MO) data integrated with the pilots’ knowledge in ship handling, as is the case of our work. This is surprising, basically for two reasons.…”