Proceedings. IEEE Symposium on FPGAs for Custom Computing Machines (Cat. No.98TB100251)
DOI: 10.1109/fpga.1998.707937
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A methodology for task based partitioning and scheduling of dynamically reconfigurable systems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
20
0

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We do not follow any particular scheduling policy. We have restricted our implementation of the service to a 2D pre-partitioned model, where the PR areas are already predefined [3]. Nevertheless the reconfiguration service could also be applied to any other kind of partitioning models.…”
Section: Layer 3: Dynamic Objects Managementmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…We do not follow any particular scheduling policy. We have restricted our implementation of the service to a 2D pre-partitioned model, where the PR areas are already predefined [3]. Nevertheless the reconfiguration service could also be applied to any other kind of partitioning models.…”
Section: Layer 3: Dynamic Objects Managementmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Past work has considered the use of dynamically reconfigurable FPGAs in high-level synthesis [34]- [36], [70]. However, in system-level synthesis, the problem is much more complex.…”
Section: A Previous Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Each block can accommodate one task at a time. Such a partitioning has been proposed by Merino et al [8] and Marescaux et al [9]. Partitioning the area simplifies scheduling and placement and makes a practical implementation on current technology more realistic.…”
Section: D Area Modelsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…The scheduler runs in EDF mode; the placer in the prefer mode. The example details the scheduling of a task set with following four tasks t x (a x , w x , c x , d x ): t 1 (1, 5, 8, 26), t 2 (2, 5, 8, 24), t 3 (8, 5, 4, 23), t 4 (9,8,4,20) The configuration and readback times for t 1 ,t 2 and t 3 are 2, for task t 4 3 time units. At time 1, t 1 arrives and starts to configure onto b 1 .…”
Section: Influence Of Configuration and Readbackmentioning
confidence: 99%