2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.euromechsol.2009.12.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A micro scale Timoshenko beam model based on strain gradient elasticity theory

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

4
160
1
4

Year Published

2012
2012
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 394 publications
(178 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
4
160
1
4
Order By: Relevance
“…In Equation (10), the deviator stretch gradient tensor, symmetric gradient rotation tensor, and corresponding dilatation are defined as [2]:…”
Section: Governing Equationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In Equation (10), the deviator stretch gradient tensor, symmetric gradient rotation tensor, and corresponding dilatation are defined as [2]:…”
Section: Governing Equationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To capture the effect of various parameters in micro-and nanoscale, some new theories have been developed. Eringen's nonlocal [1] and strain gradient [2] theories have been proposed to capture the effect of material length scale parameters in nano-and microscales, respectively. Studying the behavior of a three-layer microbeam can present important informations for researchers.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As from previous considerations, the boundary conditions of the model involve, only, the local generalized forces and/or the prescribed displacements at the borders as N (l) (x 3i , t) = ∓N i , T (l) (x 3i , t) = ∓T i and M (l) (x 3i , t) = ±M i or, alternatively, the prescribed kinematic field reads u(x 3i , t) = u i (t), v(x 3i , t) = v i (t) and ϕ(x 3i , t) = ϕ i (t) with u i (t), v i (t) and ϕ i (t) (i = 0, L) denoting prescribed displacements and rotations at the ends of the beam. The MB Timoshenko beam model, governed by equation (3.3), along with the boundary conditions, exhibits non-local effects for general loading conditions [31,32] and not necessarily for distributed loads only, thus overcoming the paradox encountered in earlier studies [33][34][35][36][37][38]. The MB Timoshenko beam model is very versatile because it may reproduce a variety of material behaviours, either stiffer or softer than the local one, by proper selection of the physical parameters and the internal length scale of the material l 0 governing the maximum distance beyond which the long-range forces become negligible.…”
Section: The Mechanically Based Timoshenko Beam Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They revealed that the static deformation obtained by the non-classical continuum theory is generally lower than that of the classical beam model. Wang et al [32] presented a refined Timoshenko beam formulations based on the strain gradient elasticity theory which can be easily reduced to those of the classical Timoshenko beam model. Ansari et al [33] studied the size-dependent free vibration behavior of Timoshenko microbeams made of functionally graded materials (FGMs) based on the modified strain gradient elasticity theory.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%