2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.palaeo.2021.110473
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A middle Miocene vertebrate assemblage from the Czech part of the Vienna Basin: Implications for the paleoenvironments of the Central Paratethys

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 76 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…While the Ries impact has been Ar-Ar-dated at a precise age of ~ 14.81 Ma 5,6 , the current best-estimate age for the Steinheim impact is derived entirely from biostratigraphic constraints. Assigning a late MN 6 to transitional MN 6/7 age to the impact, the Steinheim event most likely occurred in the terminal Langhian 12 or earliest Serravallian 58 , around ~ 14.3 to 14.0 Ma. Considering the most recent high-precision geochronologigic results for the Langhian/Serravallian boundary (13.82 Ma 59 ; ~ 13.8 Ma 60 ), a late Langhian Steinheim impact scenario 5,6 is embedded in OSM deposits that contain faunal elements characteristic for the ELMZ MN 5/6 to MN 6.…”
Section: Biostratigraphic Arguments For a Steinheim-age Upper Seismit...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While the Ries impact has been Ar-Ar-dated at a precise age of ~ 14.81 Ma 5,6 , the current best-estimate age for the Steinheim impact is derived entirely from biostratigraphic constraints. Assigning a late MN 6 to transitional MN 6/7 age to the impact, the Steinheim event most likely occurred in the terminal Langhian 12 or earliest Serravallian 58 , around ~ 14.3 to 14.0 Ma. Considering the most recent high-precision geochronologigic results for the Langhian/Serravallian boundary (13.82 Ma 59 ; ~ 13.8 Ma 60 ), a late Langhian Steinheim impact scenario 5,6 is embedded in OSM deposits that contain faunal elements characteristic for the ELMZ MN 5/6 to MN 6.…”
Section: Biostratigraphic Arguments For a Steinheim-age Upper Seismit...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…SNM, NHMW (Tóth, 2010a(Tóth, , 2010bZapfe, 1954) Mikulov-Czujan's sandpit (CZ); middle Miocene, MN6, teeth, shortened mandibles without tusks as well as some with tusks alveoli, postcranial bones, coll. MZM, PIUW, RMM (Březina, 2014;Březina and Ivanov, 2015;Březina et al, 2021). Elgg (CH); middle Miocene, MN6-7; type specimen of Z. turicensis: m2 sin, coll.…”
Section: Zygolophodon Turicensis Groupmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Březina et al 2021) to bi-directional(Ruman et al 2017) cross-beds and clinostrati ed, unsorted conglomerate bodies(Nehyba and Roetzel 2004;Baráth 2009). These facies are associated with alternating terrestrial ( uvial and alluvial fans) and shallow marine environments (wave and tidedominated coast)(Pivko et al 2017;Ruman et al 2017).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%