2014
DOI: 10.3139/124.110411
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A model-based approach to operational event groups ranking

Abstract: The operational experience (OE) feedback provides improvements in all industrial activities. Identification of the most important and valuable groups of events within accumulated experience is important in order to focus on a detailed investigation of events. The paper describes the new ranking method and compares it with three others. Methods have been described and applied to OE events utilised by nuclear power plants in France and Germany for twenty years. The results show that different ranking methods onl… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…where RI is ranking index, EG is event group, and is weights for respected parameter. These weights could be judged by experts directly or more transparently and consistently by using some methods like the analytical hierarchy process (AHP, [3,5]) where the only requirement is to make pairwise comparisons for all parameters. Table 2 presents a set of RI weights used in Table 3).…”
Section: Ranking Methods and Inputs For Uncertainty Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…where RI is ranking index, EG is event group, and is weights for respected parameter. These weights could be judged by experts directly or more transparently and consistently by using some methods like the analytical hierarchy process (AHP, [3,5]) where the only requirement is to make pairwise comparisons for all parameters. Table 2 presents a set of RI weights used in Table 3).…”
Section: Ranking Methods and Inputs For Uncertainty Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(Selected results are presented in the Table 4 for the FR and Table 5 for the DE datasets under column "AHP point. ") separately and this analysis applies to the AHP based ranking method, [3]. Uncertainty of dataset values is considered outside this assessment because it is epistemic and not significant (in comparison to the ranking uncertainties).…”
Section: Ranking Methods and Inputs For Uncertainty Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations