2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.omega.2009.10.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A modified DEA model to estimate the importance of objectives with an application to agricultural economics

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
32
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 56 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
0
32
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Decision making model specification is based on estimating the utility function of farmers by developing weighted goal programing model which is proposed as suitable approach of farmer's behavior in case of multi objectives (Sumpsi, 1997;Amador, 1998). Such farmers' behavior modelling was successfully applied in various agricultural problem fields in different countries (Amador, 1998;Gomez-Limon, 2000;Andre, 2010;Rozakis, 2012). To estimate the utility function of farmers in each cluster following steps were performed:…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Decision making model specification is based on estimating the utility function of farmers by developing weighted goal programing model which is proposed as suitable approach of farmer's behavior in case of multi objectives (Sumpsi, 1997;Amador, 1998). Such farmers' behavior modelling was successfully applied in various agricultural problem fields in different countries (Amador, 1998;Gomez-Limon, 2000;Andre, 2010;Rozakis, 2012). To estimate the utility function of farmers in each cluster following steps were performed:…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Considering crop production plan x = ( 1 , … , 8 ) = (wheat, rye, barley, oats, triticale, rape, buckwheat, fallow) following most important farmers' objectives have been selected (Andre, 2010):…”
Section: Min ∑ + =1mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The projection method reduces the approximation error as compared to other alternatives (André et al 2010;André and Riesgo 2007), but still yields an error that is measured by using calibration residuals (see next section).…”
Section: Efficient Frontier and Tangency Pointmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2 model can't meet cone characteristic (which means that k times resource input can't bring out k times output) [61]. In the economic system, the construction of evaluation indexes system is complicated, some indexes meet core characteristics while others do not, partial important influencing factors would inevitably been given up based on the single DEA model.…”
Section: Gsmentioning
confidence: 99%