Dissociative adsorption of HCl on Au(111) has become one of unsolved puzzles in surface chemistry. Despite tremendous efforts in the past years, various theoretical models still greatly overestimate the zero-coverage initial sticking probabilities (S0). To find the origin of the large experiment-theory discrepancy, we have revisited the dissociative adsorption of HCl on Au(111) with a newly designed molecular beam-surface apparatus. The zero-coverage S0 derived from Cl-coverage measurements with varying HCl doses agree well with previous ones. However, we notice a sharp change of the coverage/dose slope with the HCl dosage at the low coverage regime, which may result in some uncertainties to the fitted S0 value. This seems consistent with a coverage-dependence of the dissociation barrier predicted by density functional theory at low Cl-coverages. Our results reveal the potential inconsistency of utilizing simulations with finite coverage to compare; against experimental data with zero coverage in this system, and provide guidance for improving both experiment and theory in this regard.