Fine et al. Reply: In our Letter [1], we reported on the formation of three autoionizing states of neutral, 2p core-excited Na ء0 2p 5 3s3l ͑l s, p, d͒ observed in the electron spectra of ion-bombarded sodium halide surfaces. We proposed that the formation of these Na ء0 states, due to electron capture by collisionally excited moving excitons Na ء1 2p 5 3s, 3p, 3d [2], involves Landau or Zener-type resonant electron transfer in Na ء1 collisions with lattice halogen ions. Evidence for such a mechanism comes from measurements obtained on slightly halogen-depleted NaCl surfaces (Fig. 1) which show that near surface Cl 2 is involved in the neutralization of the above excitonic states [1]. Such moving Na ء0 atoms can, clearly, autoionize inside the solid or, if they are sputtered, outside.In the preceding Comment [3] and in [4], Baragiola acknowledges that the formation of Na ء0 does involve electron capture by Na ء1 but disputes our collisional electron-capture model. He suggests that the neutralization process involves Na ء1 and weakly bound surface electrons and explicitly rules out any electron transfer from halogen ions. We believe that his neutralization concept [3,4] is not consistent with our experimental data [1] for the following two reasons.(1) The electron signals of the three Na ء0 transitions are very intense with an estimated yield for NaCl of 2 3 10 23 electrons/projectile ion [5]. This very high yield is consistent with the molecular dynamics (MD) simulation of the Na ء1 excitation or neutralization (by electron-transfer collisions with Cl 2 ) process. The MD yield is 10 24 [5]. It is difficult to imagine that such a high