1996
DOI: 10.1016/0168-583x(95)00871-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A molecular dynamics study of collisional excitation/deexcitation at ion-bombarded surfaces

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

1
3
0

Year Published

1996
1996
2008
2008

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

2
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
1
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…(1) The electron signals of the three Na ‫ء0‬ transitions are very intense with an estimated yield for NaCl of 2 3 10 23 electrons/projectile ion [5]. This very high yield is consistent with the molecular dynamics (MD) simulation of the Na ‫ء1‬ excitation or neutralization (by electron-transfer collisions with Cl 2 ) process.…”
supporting
confidence: 73%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…(1) The electron signals of the three Na ‫ء0‬ transitions are very intense with an estimated yield for NaCl of 2 3 10 23 electrons/projectile ion [5]. This very high yield is consistent with the molecular dynamics (MD) simulation of the Na ‫ء1‬ excitation or neutralization (by electron-transfer collisions with Cl 2 ) process.…”
supporting
confidence: 73%
“…He suggests that the neutralization process involves Na ‫ء1‬ and weakly bound surface electrons and explicitly rules out any electron transfer from halogen ions. We believe that his neutralization concept [3,4] is not consistent with our experimental data [1] for the following two reasons.(1) The electron signals of the three Na ‫ء0‬ transitions are very intense with an estimated yield for NaCl of 2 3 10 23 electrons/projectile ion [5]. This very high yield is consistent with the molecular dynamics (MD) simulation of the Na ‫ء1‬ excitation or neutralization (by electron-transfer collisions with Cl 2 ) process.…”
mentioning
confidence: 61%
“…It follows that excited, sputtered Na + * ions can decay, as we have noted, only radiatively and therefore not contribute to the electron spectra observed. According to some recent molecular dynamics simulations [ 8 ], collisionally excited particles that do not undergo subsequent energetic (small impact parameter) collisions with target atoms appear to dominate the number of collisionally excited particles that are sputtered. It would therefore seem reasonable to assume that for sodium halide crystals most of the ejected, excited particles which subsequently deexcite outside the solid are Na + * and do not contribute to the electron spectra.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…11 . The projectile P represents either Ar or Ne particles; the initial Na + excitation step is assumed to occur in a projectile-sodium collision (P 0,+ + Na + ) [ 8 ] but the specific type of Na + excitation collision is not critical to the sequence that follows.…”
Section: Collisional Kinetics In a Sodium Halide Latticementioning
confidence: 99%