2008
DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/53/19/017
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Monte Carlo study of lung counting efficiency for female workers of different breast sizes using deformable phantoms

Abstract: There are currently no physical phantoms available for calibrating in vivo counting devices that represent women with different breast sizes because such phantoms are difficult, time consuming and expensive to fabricate. In this work, a feasible alternative involving computational phantoms was explored. A series of new female voxel phantoms with different breast sizes were developed and ported into a Monte Carlo radiation transport code for performing virtual lung counting efficiency calibrations. The phantoms… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
35
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
35
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Features related to body height and other lengths or other body parts show low performances. No correlation ( 2 < 0.05 for XCAT for all photon energies) was observed between cup size (difference of bust circumference and underbust circumference) and counting efficiency for lungs, which was reported by Hegenbart et al (2008) and Farah, Broggio and Franck (2010). However, larger detectors (phoswich detectors and a 2 × 2 HPGe array) and detector positions (frontal to the breasts in the first case) were chosen in these works, which could explain the deviations.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 89%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Features related to body height and other lengths or other body parts show low performances. No correlation ( 2 < 0.05 for XCAT for all photon energies) was observed between cup size (difference of bust circumference and underbust circumference) and counting efficiency for lungs, which was reported by Hegenbart et al (2008) and Farah, Broggio and Franck (2010). However, larger detectors (phoswich detectors and a 2 × 2 HPGe array) and detector positions (frontal to the breasts in the first case) were chosen in these works, which could explain the deviations.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…This topic was addressed by several authors. Hegenbart et al (2008) and Farah, Broggio and Franck (2010) created series of person-dependent female phantoms with varying cup sizes for application to lung counting with phoswich and germanium detectors respectively. They found a negative correlation of breast mass and cup size to counting efficiency.…”
Section: Cup Sizementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The paper by Xu et al was rated one of the 10 best papers in 2007 by Physics in Medicine and Biology. Continuing their triangular mesh approach, this group reported in 2008 the development of a pair of adult male and female phantoms, the so-called RPI Adult Male and Female [110,111,112]. This pair of adult phantoms was carefully adjusted to match the ICRP-89 reference values for more than 70 organs and 45 bones (including cortical bone, spongiosa, and cavities) as well as muscles.…”
Section: Brep Phantoms From 2000s To Presentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The RPI Adult Male and Female phantoms are mesh-based BREP phantoms [112]. As an application, the female phantom was recently used to create phantoms of female workers with different breast sizes for the purpose of studying the effect of this parameter on the lung counting of internally deposited radionuclides [110]. The mesh models had to be converted to voxels to work with Monte Carlo codes that only handle CSG shapes.…”
Section: Brep Phantoms From 2000s To Presentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An alternative to the use of physical phantoms consists in computing the calibration coefficients using 3D models of the monitored subjects or a 3D model closer to the subject than the physical phantom (Kramer et al 2003a(Kramer et al , 2004Becker et al 2006). For the female case, this approach has been recently considered by Hegenbart et al (2008) for lung monitoring with phoswich detectors.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%