2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.aca.2005.10.034
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A morphological study of molecularly imprinted polymers using the scanning electron microscope

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
39
0
2

Year Published

2006
2006
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 75 publications
(44 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
1
39
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The SEM micrographs were revealed that Py-IP with imprinting effect of pyrogallol showed relatively rougher microstructure. The rougher surface was attributed to the binding occurred, resulting in cavities when the template was removed (González et al, 2006). A few similar observations were also reported, which were attributed to the differences in surface morphology between the imprinted polymer and the NIPs (Ahamed et al, 2013;Santos et al, 2014;Sikiti et al, 2014) studied by SEM.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 62%
“…The SEM micrographs were revealed that Py-IP with imprinting effect of pyrogallol showed relatively rougher microstructure. The rougher surface was attributed to the binding occurred, resulting in cavities when the template was removed (González et al, 2006). A few similar observations were also reported, which were attributed to the differences in surface morphology between the imprinted polymer and the NIPs (Ahamed et al, 2013;Santos et al, 2014;Sikiti et al, 2014) studied by SEM.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 62%
“…Gonzalez et al [55] systemic studied the non-covalent MIP synthesized by "bulk" polymerization using digoxin as template. These polymers were synthesized under different conditions, i.e., changing the functional monomers employed (methacrylic acid or 2-vinylpyridine), the porogenic solvents (acetonitrile or dichloromethane) used, different polymerization and extraction processes were used.…”
Section: Bulk Polymerizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As from Table 3, slightly greater NAM selectivity over benzamide and pyridine were observed for MIP9 and MIP10, suggesting better aqueous selectivity of these polymers over the others. MIPs can have various physical configurations depending on the method used in the polymerization process [34]. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) was thus used to characterize the morphology of the obtained MIPs.…”
Section: Substrate Selectivity Of Mipsmentioning
confidence: 99%