2002
DOI: 10.1046/j.1475-1313.2002.00066.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A multi‐centre study of lapsed contact lens wearers

Abstract: A high proportion of lapsed contact lens wearers can be successfully refitted with contact lenses. The prime reason for previous discontinuation from contact lenses is discomfort and, in particular, dryness-related discomfort. In many cases, previous contact lens failure is product or practitioner-related rather than because of patient-specific problems. Once refitted with contact lenses, lapsed wearers cite vision problems rather than discomfort as the most common reason for discontinuing. This finding sugges… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

9
169
1
3

Year Published

2007
2007
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 221 publications
(182 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
9
169
1
3
Order By: Relevance
“…In these lenses, it can be observed no substantial preference of P. aeruginosa to adhere to unworn hydrophilic or hydrophobic CL. Although this is consistent with other studies for other bacterial strains (Borazjani et al, 2004;Santos et al, 2008), it challenges the established relationship between microbial adhesion and lens surface hydrophobicity (Pritchard et al, 1999;Doyle, 2000;Young et al, 2002;van Oss, 2003;Giraldez et al, 2010b). This discrepancy could be explained by the different extents of microbial colonization observed for different bacterial strains, and/or the different methodologies employed (Henriques et al, 2005;Kodjikian et al, 2007).…”
Section: Staphylococcus Epidermidissupporting
confidence: 88%
“…In these lenses, it can be observed no substantial preference of P. aeruginosa to adhere to unworn hydrophilic or hydrophobic CL. Although this is consistent with other studies for other bacterial strains (Borazjani et al, 2004;Santos et al, 2008), it challenges the established relationship between microbial adhesion and lens surface hydrophobicity (Pritchard et al, 1999;Doyle, 2000;Young et al, 2002;van Oss, 2003;Giraldez et al, 2010b). This discrepancy could be explained by the different extents of microbial colonization observed for different bacterial strains, and/or the different methodologies employed (Henriques et al, 2005;Kodjikian et al, 2007).…”
Section: Staphylococcus Epidermidissupporting
confidence: 88%
“…A mesma já foi usada em pesquisas oculares tais como: dor ocular em pacientes com uveíte (13) , sensação provocada por estimulação corneana (14) , conforto ocular durante a relação de trabalhos em terminais de vídeo (15) e em usuários de lentes de contato rígidas (10) . Segundo a literatura, o desconforto é a principal razão pela qual os pacientes abandonam o uso de lentes de contato (16)(17)(18)(19) . Grande parte dos recentes avanços nos materiais de lentes de contato, desenho e formas de uso e sistemas de limpeza e manutenção das mesmas tem como objetivo reduzir o descon- forto apresentado pelos pacientes (16) .…”
Section: Discussionunclassified
“…Segundo a literatura, o desconforto é a principal razão pela qual os pacientes abandonam o uso de lentes de contato (16)(17)(18)(19) . Grande parte dos recentes avanços nos materiais de lentes de contato, desenho e formas de uso e sistemas de limpeza e manutenção das mesmas tem como objetivo reduzir o descon- forto apresentado pelos pacientes (16) . O aumento do conforto e a diminuição de sintomas associados ao olho seco é apontado como o principal fator que pode evitar o descontinuamento do uso de lentes (20) .…”
Section: Discussionunclassified
“…It is estimated that there are more than 140,000,000 users of contact lenses in the world, being at least 2,000,000 of them in Brazil, according to estimates of Sociedade Brasileira de Lentes de Contato (SOBLEC) (1) . While there are plenty of scientific articles related to unsuccessful adaptation of contact lenses in general and to complications caused by them (2)(3)(4)(5)(6) , there is few data in the literature regarding the conditions of use or not of CL specifically by patients with optical medical indication. There is a lack of consistent studies showing and justifying the lack of use of CL by these patients, since the CL are necessary to have good vision.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%