2018
DOI: 10.1007/s10669-018-9672-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A multi-criteria decision analysis of solid waste treatment options in Pakistan: Lahore City—a case in point

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Finally, in scenario 8, CCS is deployed to reduce the GHG emission during energy recovery processes. Greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions (Arıkan et al, 2017;Hokkanen & Salminen, 1997;Pires et al, 2011;Vučijak et al, 2016;Yap & Nixon, 2015) Energy recovery (Arıkan et al, 2017) Waste recovery (Arıkan et al, 2017) Distance related (Vego et al, 2008) Ecological footprint (Herva & Roca, 2013;Hung et al, 2007) Noise and dust (Ali et al, 2018) Geographical location (Khan & Faisal, 2008) Leachate (Ali et al, 2018) Hygienic conditions that have an impact on human health (Hokkanen & Salminen, 1997;Hung et al, 2007;Khan & Faisal, 2008;Pires et al, 2011;Vučijak et al, 2016;Yap & Nixon, 2015) Economic Operation cost (Ali et al, 2018;Arıkan et al, 2017;Coban et al, 2018;Hokkanen & Salminen, 1997;Pires et al, 2011;Vego et al, 2008;Vučijak et al, 2016;Yap & Nixon, 2015) Pre-treatment cost (Yap & Nixon, 2015) Net cost per ton (Hokkanen & Salminen, 1997) Budget control (Khan & Faisal, 2008) Opportunity cost (Ali et al, 2018) Transportation cost (Ali et al, 2018;Arıkan et al, 2017;Coban et al, 2018) Capital cost (Ali et al, 2018;<...>…”
Section: Best-worst Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, in scenario 8, CCS is deployed to reduce the GHG emission during energy recovery processes. Greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions (Arıkan et al, 2017;Hokkanen & Salminen, 1997;Pires et al, 2011;Vučijak et al, 2016;Yap & Nixon, 2015) Energy recovery (Arıkan et al, 2017) Waste recovery (Arıkan et al, 2017) Distance related (Vego et al, 2008) Ecological footprint (Herva & Roca, 2013;Hung et al, 2007) Noise and dust (Ali et al, 2018) Geographical location (Khan & Faisal, 2008) Leachate (Ali et al, 2018) Hygienic conditions that have an impact on human health (Hokkanen & Salminen, 1997;Hung et al, 2007;Khan & Faisal, 2008;Pires et al, 2011;Vučijak et al, 2016;Yap & Nixon, 2015) Economic Operation cost (Ali et al, 2018;Arıkan et al, 2017;Coban et al, 2018;Hokkanen & Salminen, 1997;Pires et al, 2011;Vego et al, 2008;Vučijak et al, 2016;Yap & Nixon, 2015) Pre-treatment cost (Yap & Nixon, 2015) Net cost per ton (Hokkanen & Salminen, 1997) Budget control (Khan & Faisal, 2008) Opportunity cost (Ali et al, 2018) Transportation cost (Ali et al, 2018;Arıkan et al, 2017;Coban et al, 2018) Capital cost (Ali et al, 2018;<...>…”
Section: Best-worst Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The wide implementation of CE principles in waste management would help achieve sustainable development goals in the country (Tariq et al, 2021 ). However, a joint effort is needed where all the stakeholders including the society have to play their part (Ali et al 2018a , 2018b ). Recent literature on the waste management sector of Pakistan is limited and does not concentrate on the CE trend.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Lahore is facing rapid urbanization where the population is growing at the rate of 3.2%. This rate is even larger than the average population increase in Pakistan, and hasty urban development is causing several issues such as temperature increases, which creates a suitable environment for dengue mosquitoes [28,[75][76][77]. Naqvi et al [28] explained climate and dengue synergism, reflecting the significance of climatic conditions for dengue transmission in Lahore.…”
Section: Study Areamentioning
confidence: 99%