“…Finally, in scenario 8, CCS is deployed to reduce the GHG emission during energy recovery processes. Greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions (Arıkan et al, 2017;Hokkanen & Salminen, 1997;Pires et al, 2011;Vučijak et al, 2016;Yap & Nixon, 2015) Energy recovery (Arıkan et al, 2017) Waste recovery (Arıkan et al, 2017) Distance related (Vego et al, 2008) Ecological footprint (Herva & Roca, 2013;Hung et al, 2007) Noise and dust (Ali et al, 2018) Geographical location (Khan & Faisal, 2008) Leachate (Ali et al, 2018) Hygienic conditions that have an impact on human health (Hokkanen & Salminen, 1997;Hung et al, 2007;Khan & Faisal, 2008;Pires et al, 2011;Vučijak et al, 2016;Yap & Nixon, 2015) Economic Operation cost (Ali et al, 2018;Arıkan et al, 2017;Coban et al, 2018;Hokkanen & Salminen, 1997;Pires et al, 2011;Vego et al, 2008;Vučijak et al, 2016;Yap & Nixon, 2015) Pre-treatment cost (Yap & Nixon, 2015) Net cost per ton (Hokkanen & Salminen, 1997) Budget control (Khan & Faisal, 2008) Opportunity cost (Ali et al, 2018) Transportation cost (Ali et al, 2018;Arıkan et al, 2017;Coban et al, 2018) Capital cost (Ali et al, 2018;<...>…”