2017
DOI: 10.3390/w9040291
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis System for Prioritizing Sites and Types of Low Impact Development Practices: Case of Korea

Abstract: Abstract:This study developed a multi-criteria decision analysis (MCDA) framework to prioritize sites and types of low impact development (LID) practices. This framework was systemized as a web-based system coupled with the Storm Water Management Model (SWMM). Using TOPSIS method, which is a type of MCDA method, multiple types and sites of designated LID practices are prioritized. This system is named the Water Management Prioritization Module (WMPM). WMPM can simultaneously determine the priority of multiple … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
23
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
0
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The most even results were obtained for the group of economic criteria. This may be due to the fact that the costs of building and operating the same system may differ depending on local conditions, as indicated by Song and Chung [55] for the example of South Korea. For this reason, it may be beneficial to perform a detailed cost (C) and benefit (B) analysis as part of the ongoing investment process and to determine the B/C ratio [56].…”
Section: Optionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The most even results were obtained for the group of economic criteria. This may be due to the fact that the costs of building and operating the same system may differ depending on local conditions, as indicated by Song and Chung [55] for the example of South Korea. For this reason, it may be beneficial to perform a detailed cost (C) and benefit (B) analysis as part of the ongoing investment process and to determine the B/C ratio [56].…”
Section: Optionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It can be practised as a way to engage different stakeholders in the decision-making process (Assumpção et al 2018). Also, collaboration strategies also enables stakeholders to select indicators (Song and Chung 2017) with consensus agreement (de Brito, Evers, and Höllermann 2017). However, some authors argue that the decision-maker may be unable to quantify weights preferences (Roodposhti et al 2016), which can overestimate or underestimate the impacts.…”
Section: Challenges Of Vulnerability and Exposure Assessmentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…From a climate perspective, it is also necessary to determine the vegetation type and distribution to achieve the best outcomes [10]. The effectiveness of each choice is influenced by the installation location [55], type, and the percentage of area occupied with one (or more) of these practices [53].…”
Section: Sustainable Measures Modellingmentioning
confidence: 99%