2022
DOI: 10.1007/s11356-022-18839-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A multi-criteria GIS-based model for wind farm site selection with the least impact on environmental pollution using the OWA-ANP method

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0
1

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
0
9
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…An absent classification scheme sometimes appeared concurrently with other modeling decisions. Of the 32 studies in this review that did not classify Wind Speed ( Tables 2 a and 2b ), GIS-based studies that included an equation-based economic/technical analysis of potential wind farm locations often lacked a classification scheme [ 76 , 82 , 146 , 151 , 162 , 165 , 168 ], as did studies with a small number (less than seven) of siting factors [ 125 , 126 , 159 , 186 , 200 , 204 , 208 ]. The application of classification schemes across WiFSS studies is inconsistent and not well-defined, thus making the intended role of siting factors when comparing WiFSS study approaches potentially unclear.…”
Section: Results Fro M the Thematic Synthesismentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…An absent classification scheme sometimes appeared concurrently with other modeling decisions. Of the 32 studies in this review that did not classify Wind Speed ( Tables 2 a and 2b ), GIS-based studies that included an equation-based economic/technical analysis of potential wind farm locations often lacked a classification scheme [ 76 , 82 , 146 , 151 , 162 , 165 , 168 ], as did studies with a small number (less than seven) of siting factors [ 125 , 126 , 159 , 186 , 200 , 204 , 208 ]. The application of classification schemes across WiFSS studies is inconsistent and not well-defined, thus making the intended role of siting factors when comparing WiFSS study approaches potentially unclear.…”
Section: Results Fro M the Thematic Synthesismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Even among studies that did provide citations for their dataset sources, these citations were sometimes only the name of the government website, piece of legislation, or research institute that provided the data, without specific details regarding the dataset source [ 127 , 133 ]. When links to dataset sources were included, they were sometimes not accessible, even in recent WiFSS studies [ 134 , 151 ]. Greater emphasis should be placed on ensuring that dataset sources for siting factors are fully sourced in a manner that is consistent across WiFSS studies, in order to encourage the use of publicly available, high-quality datasets, and to standardize their citation and presentation in published work.…”
Section: Results Fro M the Thematic Synthesismentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…According to various criteria, weights are assigned to different items based on their significance as well as other factors. OWA has the advantage of making suitability maps with varying risk levels for different types of tourism (Mokarram et al., 2021; Mokarram, Pourghasemi, & Mokarram, 2022; Ronizi et al., 2020). Based on ecotourism interests and budget allocations, it determines the best tourism activities within an area spatially (Mokarram and Hojati, 2017).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…for different types of tourism (Mokarram et al, 2021;Mokarram, Pourghasemi, & Mokarram, 2022;Ronizi et al, 2020). Based on ecotourism interests and budget allocations, it determines the best tourism activities within an area spatially (Mokarram and Hojati, 2017).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%