2021
DOI: 10.1089/end.2020.0993
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Multi-Institutional Experience with Robotic Vesicovaginal and Ureterovaginal Fistula Repair After Iatrogenic Injury

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Kidd et al [23] conducted a retrospective study and observed that robotic-assisted repair had a median operating time of 187 minutes (IQR: 151-219), minimal blood loss (median 50 mL, IQR: 50-93), and a median hospitalization time of one day (IQR: 1-2), with only two patients (9%) having a postoperative complication. Eventually, 20 out of 22 included patients (91%) were free of UI at follow-up [23].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Kidd et al [23] conducted a retrospective study and observed that robotic-assisted repair had a median operating time of 187 minutes (IQR: 151-219), minimal blood loss (median 50 mL, IQR: 50-93), and a median hospitalization time of one day (IQR: 1-2), with only two patients (9%) having a postoperative complication. Eventually, 20 out of 22 included patients (91%) were free of UI at follow-up [23].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Subsequently, Siddighi and Carri (21) reported that they successfully repaired UVFs robotically using five ports in three patients. The sparsity of the literature, as well as small case series, reflects the exploration of ureteral implantation for UVF in Table 2 (2,16,(19)(20)(21)(22)(23)(24). Based on the surgical outcomes of the considered studies, the benefits of robotic-assisted implantation are highlighted to a certain extent in the previous literature.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are only three studies that included more than 15 patients, with a respective mean operative time of 127.5 min (100-270), 133 ± 48 min and 187 min (151-219 min), and a reported success rate of 100%, 93.3% and 91%. 57,58,67 Most surgeons have used the conventional transvesical approach with some form of tissue interposition. A robotic extravesical approach for VVF repair was first reported in 2007 by Schimpf et al 63 In summary, due to the small number of VVF cases repaired robotically in addition to the heterogeneity of studies, there is a need for more prospective and comparative studies with greater patient numbers and longer follow-ups.…”
Section: Studymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are only three studies that included more than 15 patients, with a respective mean operative time of 127.5 min (100–270), 133 ± 48 min and 187 min (151–219 min), and a reported success rate of 100%, 93.3% and 91%. 57 , 58 , 67 …”
Section: Genitourinary Fistulamentioning
confidence: 99%