2002
DOI: 10.1016/s0167-8140(01)00494-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A multicentre randomized/controlled trial of a conventional versus modestly accelerated radiotherapy in the laryngeal cancer: influence of a 1 week shortening overall time

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
21
0
3

Year Published

2004
2004
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 60 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
1
21
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…It was therefore obvious to attempt to minimize the time available for accelerated repopulation between the single fractions of radiotherapy simply by reducing the overall treatment time and keeping the same total dose and dose per fraction. This principle has lately shown the same beneficial trend in several large clinical studies [4,5]. Among these is the Danish DAHANCA 6 & 7 study, which compared 5 fx/wk with 6 fx/wk.…”
mentioning
confidence: 91%
“…It was therefore obvious to attempt to minimize the time available for accelerated repopulation between the single fractions of radiotherapy simply by reducing the overall treatment time and keeping the same total dose and dose per fraction. This principle has lately shown the same beneficial trend in several large clinical studies [4,5]. Among these is the Danish DAHANCA 6 & 7 study, which compared 5 fx/wk with 6 fx/wk.…”
mentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Future research is required to investigate the longer term outcomes including late toxicity with comparison to the standard treatment (i.e. concurrent chemo-radiotherapy) [18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31]. …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Results in this group (group H -hypofractionated accelerated RT -KBN 6 P05C 032 20 project) were compared to results obtained in the trial that was conducted earlier in the same centers and used the same set of clinical data (group A -accelerated RT, 196 patients and group S -standard RT, 199 patients, KBN 4 3004 94C/2008 project). 20 …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%