2005
DOI: 10.1016/s0301-4215(03)00228-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A multicriteria approach to evaluate wind energy plants on an Italian island

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
86
0
11

Year Published

2006
2006
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 217 publications
(98 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
1
86
0
11
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, wind farm site selection problem has been treated as a MCDM problem in various studies. Some recent studies in this direction used weighted aggregation [25][26][27][28], fuzzy logic [29][30][31][32], and Pareto ranking [33]. A more comprehensive coverage of other relevant studies is given in a recent survey by Herbert-Acero et al [19].…”
Section: Multi-criteria Decision-making Techniques For Site Selectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, wind farm site selection problem has been treated as a MCDM problem in various studies. Some recent studies in this direction used weighted aggregation [25][26][27][28], fuzzy logic [29][30][31][32], and Pareto ranking [33]. A more comprehensive coverage of other relevant studies is given in a recent survey by Herbert-Acero et al [19].…”
Section: Multi-criteria Decision-making Techniques For Site Selectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The problem of the construction of a DSS for selecting an offshore wind location was attempted in [24], [7]. As far as decision problems relating to the project design of a wind farms are concerned, these were discussed in [6], [25]. The technical aspects of wind turbines are also related to farm designs [8] as well as wind farm development evaluation, in the bigger picture [26].…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…100m is crucial. [5], [6], [15], [17], [19]- [21], [23], [24], [26] C1.2 Output power of wind turbine [8] C1.3 Power grid voltage on the site of connection [26] C2 Economic C2.1 Yearly amount of energy generated [6], [7], [25] C2.2 Investment cost [5]- [7], [16], [25] C2.3 Operational costs per year [5], [6], [16], [25] C2.4 Incomes from generated energy per year [26] C2.5 Profits from generated energy per year [5], [6], [24] C2.6 Payback period [5]- [7] C3 Social C3.1 Number of generated workplaces [5], [6], [15] C3. C4.3 Location in Natura 2000 protected area [7], [19], [22], [23] C1.2 The maximum output power of a turbine is achieved at a specific wind speed, which is critical.…”
Section: The Proposed Decision Model For Dssmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, Wolsink (2007), for example emphasised the need to take into consideration public attitude on wind implementation decisions, not only at a general level but also at the local project level and stressed the importance of including the public in decision-making process. Also Cavallaro and Ciraolo (2005) support that social acceptability is extremely important since it may heavily influence the amount of time needed to complete the energy project. The public acceptance of a project may not be sufficient to ensure its viability, but represents a clear contribution to its success.…”
Section: Selection Of Criteriamentioning
confidence: 99%