A multidimensional scalogram analysis of UK acid attacks: exploring the differences and similarities in offending characteristics

Abstract

Purpose This study aims to determine whether cases of acid attacks within the UK could be differentiated based on the offence characteristics and motivations. Design/methodology/approach The study used a multi-dimensional scalogram analysis (MSA) to examine the similarities and differences between the behaviours that were acted out during the 30 cases. Findings Results found a clear division amongst acid attack offenders through multiple variables, mainly pertaining to whether the attack was predicated and the motivation. This was found to be comparable with instrumental and expressive actions. Practical implications The findings have potential to contribute to psychological theory to categorise and define acid attack offences. This would also greatly assist in suspect prioritisation and other aspects of police investigations. Originality/value Reports of acid attacks within the UK are rising. The motivations behind these offences are predominantly related to gang violence and acts of revenge. However, the current literature around acid attacks has largely focussed on the victim perspective, with little research around offenders and their actions.

Understanding the complexities of non-familial child abductions: a systematic literature review on the behavioural characteristics of acquaintance and stranger abductors

“…Research examining types and extent of victim injury, and other observable characteristics at a crime scene (including geo-spatial patterns, see Willmott et al , 2021), should also be examined to determine if they have applicability in determining the victim–offender relationship. Research on the latter may also prove useful in developing themes of offending and the determination of other offender characteristics (Mann et al , 2020). Furthermore, to identify risk factors of fatal outcomes, attention should be focussed on differentiating non-fatal and fatal victim, offender and offence characteristics while controlling for the victim–offender relationship.…”

“…and the determination of other offender characteristics (Mann et al 2020). Further, in order to identify risk factors of fatal outcomes, attention should be focussed on differentiating nonfatal and fatal victim, offender and offence characteristics whilst controlling for the victimoffender relationship.…”

Exploring the relationship between psychopathy and criminal thinking: utilising the Tri-PM within a forensic sample

“…Although psychopathy can provide some explanation into the emotional and behavioural antecedents of crime, it, alone, cannot sufficiently explain the cognitive processes that allow some individuals to sustain a criminal lifestyle or explain individual differences in the severity of offending approaches (Mann et al, 2020). Individual differences in cognitions and thinking styles have been used to understand why certain members of the public gravitate towards crime more than others (Sykes and Matza, 1970;Walters, 1990;Walters, 2001).…”