2021
DOI: 10.1080/15583058.2021.1992536
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Multiscale Approach for the Seismic Vulnerability Assessment of Historical Centres in Masonry Building Aggregates: Cognitive Approach and Interdisciplinary Perspectives

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The macro-element approach follows the assumption that masonry panels behave as rigid blocks connected through kinematic chains. Although the more or less refined available procedures, the methodology is a reliable approach to investigate the structural performance of masonry constructions when the structure of historical discontinuities are pointed out [56][57][58][59][60][61]. In this work, the seismic demand was needed on the basis of the geological investigation conducted and the hazard information of the area.…”
Section: Seismic Vulnerability Assessment and Multilevel Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The macro-element approach follows the assumption that masonry panels behave as rigid blocks connected through kinematic chains. Although the more or less refined available procedures, the methodology is a reliable approach to investigate the structural performance of masonry constructions when the structure of historical discontinuities are pointed out [56][57][58][59][60][61]. In this work, the seismic demand was needed on the basis of the geological investigation conducted and the hazard information of the area.…”
Section: Seismic Vulnerability Assessment and Multilevel Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In recent years, some studies tried to overcome the issues related to the seismic vulnerability assessment of URM aggregates by adopting various approaches, i.e. : holistic approach (Cardinali et al 2021); heuristic approach (e.g. Ferreira et al 2013;Vicente et al 2014;Brando et al 2017;Sandoli et al 2022;Moretic et al 2022), analytical-mechanical approach (Cocco et al 2019;Cima et al 2021;Nale et al 2021; analytical-numerical approach (Ramos and Lourenço 2004;Senaldi et al 2010;Vicente et al 2011;Fagundes et al 2017;Formisano and Massimilla 2019;Bernardini et al 2019;Degli Abbati et al 2019;Valente et al 2019;Greco et al 2020;Grillanda et al 2020;Angiolilli et al 2021;Battaglia et al 2021;Valluzzi et al 2021;Bernardo et al 2022); large-scale approaches based on empirical evaluations obtained from post-earthquake data (Del Gaudio et al 2019;Penna et al 2022a;Sisti et al 2019); as well as hybrid methods (Kappos et al 2006;Maio et al 2015) combining the previous approaches through the individuation of representative building classes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The factors characterizing aggregates are so many and so interconnected that it is difficult to unravel it with the classical tools adopted so far to interpret isolated masonry constructions. In recent years, numerous efforts and advances have been made in the literature in this regard, and several methodologies have been proposed for assessing the seismic vulnerability of buildings in aggregate: holistic approach [6]; heuristic approach [7,8,9]; mechanical-analytical approach [10,11]; mechanical-numerical approach [12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20]; large-scale approaches based on empirical evaluation obtained from post-earthquake data [4]. Also the experimental campaigns specifically addressed to face this topic are very recent and limited in number [21,22].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%