A neural substrate for atypical low-level visual processing in autism spectrum disorder

Abstract

An important characteristic of autism spectrum disorder (ASD) is increased visual detail perception. Yet, there is no standing neurobiological explanation for this aspect of the disorder. We show evidence from EEG data, from 31 control subjects (three females) and 13 subjects (two females) aged 16-28 years, for a specific impairment in object boundary detection in ASD, which is present as early as 120 ms after stimulus presentation. In line with a neural network model explicating the role of feedforward, horizontal and recurrent processing in visual perception, we can attribute this deficit to a dysfunction of horizontal connections within early visual areas. Interestingly, ASD subjects showed an increase in subsequent activity at lateral occipital sites (225 ms), which might reflect a compensational mechanism. In contrast, recurrent processing between higher and lower visual areas (around 260 ms), associated with the segregation between figure and background, was normal. Our results show specific neural abnormalities in ASD related to low-level visual processing. In addition, given the reconciliation between our findings and previous neuropathology and neurochemistry research, we suggest that atypical horizontal interactions might reflect a more general neural abnormality in this disorder.

Act Quickly, Decide Later: Long-latency Visual Processing Underlies Perceptual Decisions but Not Reflexive Behavior

“…The subtraction potentials to both the 20°and 90°ori-entation contrasts showed the characteristic pattern observed in texture segmentation tasks: a small positivity around 80-100 msec, followed by a large negative deflection between 200 and 300 msec, localized in the posterior electrodes. These two timeframes are linked respectively to boundary detection and surface segregation Vandenbroucke, Scholte, van Engeland, Lamme, & Kemner, 2008).…”

Enhanced perception in savant syndrome: patterns, structure and creativity

“…In the auditory modality, superior pitch discrimination, labelling and memory also co-occur (Bonnel et al 2003;Heaton 2003). Mechanisms involved in these perceptual skill superiorities are not yet fully understood, but a more extensive and atypical involvement of primary and associative perceptual areas during perceptual tasks (Gaffrey et al 2007;Manjaly et al 2007;Milne et al 2009), atypical lateral inhibition in both modalities (Bertone et al 2005;Vandenbroucke et al 2008) and functional autonomy of perceptual operations from top-down processing influences (Caron et al 2006) are complementary and promising physiological explanations.…”

Chronic negative mood affects internal representations of negative facial expressions – An internet study

“…We found a significant 16 correlation between chronic mood of the participants who did the reverse correlation experiment, 17 and the subsequent ratings of the classification images by independent observers: the more 18 depressed the participant, the less negative his or her classification image was rated. In other 19 words, the mental representation of negative emotional expression is less negative for more 20 depressed participants, and the more depressed an observer is, the more likely that observer is to However, do such processes also play a role in normal perception (or rather, in other tasks than 9 the rather artificial reverse correlation task we used here)?…”

“…Adding noise adds random features to the faces, which in 16 some cases will make the faces appear more negative. By averaging all images that have been 17 chosen as the saddest of the pair of faces, the features that make a face look negative will stand 18 out in the resulting average image, the so-called classification image. It is important to realize 19 that this classification image does not reflect a threshold for detecting negative emotion (i.e., 20 faces that look more negative than the classification image are classified as negative by the 21 participant).…”